SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (90249)9/2/2010 11:43:54 AM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224704
 
Election 2010: Senate Balance Of Power
Balance of Power: Washington Moves from Leans Democrat to Toss-Up
Thursday, September 02, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Advertisement
New polling in Washington has moved that state's U.S. Senate race from Leans Democrat to Toss-Up.

Other changes this week came from polling in Alaska, Ohio, and West Virginia.

Current projections suggest that the Democrats would hold 48 seats after Election Day while the Republicans would hold 45. Seven states are in the Toss-Up category (California, Colorado, Illinois, Nevada, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Washington. Six of the seven Toss-Ups are seats currently held by Democrats. Ohio is the only exception.

Republicans have the edge in five Democratic-held Senate seats--Arkansas, Indiana, North Dakota, Delaware and Pennsylvania.

At the moment, no Republican-held seats appear headed for the Democratic column.

The state results and overall projections will be updated whenever new polling data justifies a change (to learn how Rasmussen Reports determines its Balance of Power rankings, click here).

In the table below, the states marked in red currently have a Republican senator. Those in blue currently have a Democratic senator.

(MORE)

rasmussenreports.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (90249)9/2/2010 1:45:11 PM
From: tonto4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224704
 
and they are going to gain, how?

Do you think that these people will be offered a total pay package as high as less risky people? Or will the additional insurance expense require companies to lower the pay offered?

Then, older and disabled people will become my clients.