SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spekulatius who wrote (39079)9/3/2010 12:10:03 PM
From: E_K_S  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78464
 
RE: Penn West Energy Trust (PWE) - Q2 2010 Investor Update

How did you arrive at the BOE(crude) $ price of $15.00 and the BCF (NG) $1.5?

According to their 2009 annual report (pg. 22)
pennwest.com

Their Netback BOE 2009 price average was $26.32/BOE.

This is net of:
royalties - $7.66/boe
operating expenses - $14.93/boe
transportation - $0.52/boe

- Netbacks for 2009 were $26.32 per boe compared to $39.85 per boe in 2008 and $31.51 per boe in 2007. The decline resulted
from lower commodity prices for most of 2009.

Therefore, one could argue that the $15.00/boe number that you use for crude is too low perhaps by 40%.

=============================================================
Here is another way to arrive at the same number.

Note: Here is a table of their average selling price per BOE and/or mcf 2009 ($49.43/boe) vs 2008 ($66.60/boe) (pg 10) pennwest.com

After subtracting out the per BOE operating expenses, roylties & transportation of $23.11$49.43/boe (from above) from the net average BOE selling price, you arrive at their Netback BOE number of $26.32.
=============================================================
Notice that their development cost per BOE have come down substantially from earlier years.

- For 2009 proved plus probable finding and development costs, excluding future development capital, were $13.75 per boe
(2008 - $18.94, 2007 - $29.43) with a recycle ratio of 1.9 (2008 - 2.1, 2007 - 1.1).

This may further be reduced with horizontal "in-fill" drilling technology which is being deployed. The net affect is a better ROI on their Capex spending.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

I have not analyzed many of these E&P oil company reports and many of the numbers thrown out like "proved" vs "probable" and BOE expense and production amounts may be incorrect and/or just bad estimates.

Why use Enterprise Value (EV) and not Market Cap when comparing under/over BOE valuation analysis? Isn't the market cap value (# of shares outstanding X $price/share) a better indication of what you have to pay for the asset?

I do appreciate you review because it allows me to see how others value these types of assets.

EKS