Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: axial who wrote (35428)	9/3/2010 3:14:55 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

Jim, Tim... The dynamic that both of you have been dancing around, as is the case in almost every other discussion of this type - including the reference article, and indeed, in many discussions that I find myself being seduced into, as well. The dynamic of which I speak is the largely inconvenient, but much ignored truth that, with rare exceptions due to special circumstances, the best network yields no financial bounty to anyone at all, bar none. That is, except to those who make use of it, of course, and this holds true despite the vesting that numerous parties on both sides of the private-public divide possess in realizing their preferred models succeeding. It's only when the information flows on such networks are mediated and altered for gain that they begin to assume an imputed form of "value" that otherwise would be as commodified in nature as sand is in its pre-molten state. As a refresher, see The Paradox of the Best Network (c.2001), by David Isenberg and David Weinberger with comments from Roxane Googin, at: netparadox.com FAC ------

To: axial who wrote (35428)	9/3/2010 3:34:00 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

If they are under-performing (or even not under-performing) monopolists, I would think the best strategy is to stop supporting their monopoly. Now not all of the monopoly issue is due to government support. It takes a lot of investment to compete, so you won't always have as much competition as would be liked. But government support for monopolies, both in direct terms, and by regulatory requirements making it more difficult for competitors to state up or expand isn't an insignificant factor. And to the extent the government starts taking over, or is even perceived as being somewhat likely to take over, you strongly discourage any private efforts to compete against the incumbents.