Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (90369)	9/3/2010 7:30:28 PM
From: lorne	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224718

Open letter to Ground Zero imam September 03, 2010 wnd.com Dear Feisal Abdul Rauf, The bottom line is that America wants to know if you are moderate. We have seen another imam before you, Anwar Awlaki, say on NPR and PBS that he condemned terrorism and even advocated for religious dialogue. He vanished and is now being chased by U.S. drones. You, too, seem to have vanished. We have not heard from you and we suspect that the reason you do not answer any questions is because you have great connections that speak in your defense – the president of the most powerful nation on earth, the mayor of the greatest city in our nation and the speaker of the House. We asked them about you and they simply tell us not to be alarmists, that we should judge you by your "positive" accomplishments. A drawback to this way of thinking can, at times, be akin to ignoring a drop of cyanide in a punch bowl. Remember Awlaki? Nancy Pelosi insists that you are moderate and that 71 percent of us are: stereotypical, racists, divisive, inflammatory, hateful, Islamophobic, bigoted, ignorant and intolerant. She says that you are all about reconciliation, but I couldn't find your take on converts from Islam to other religions. Would you reconcile with them? You refused to sign a patriotic act to condemn the killing of converts from Islam to Christianity. This should be no problem since the president is a convert from Islam – and after all, he trusts you. Why else would Pelosi send you as an envoy to discuss an "American-style Islam" and an "Islamic democracy" in the Middle East? It sure beats the heck out of Obama's oxymoronic capitalistic-socialism and Obamacare. However, I would like to know if your American-style Islamic Shariah would include interest banking since our whole capitalistic system depends on it. Check out Shoebat's books "For God or For Tyranny" and "God's War on Terror." It's nice that the Cordoba building will have a swimming pool, lecture hauls, sports centers and bridge-building classes. The name "Cordoba" was brilliant to promote the golden age of Islam when Christians were honored for accommodating a crescent in place of a cross; at least we all now know that Cordoba Mosque was built during the golden age of Christendom. But perhaps Americans are being too harsh and are getting back at the wrong Muslims when they say: "We do not want them to have anything next to Ground Zero." After all, the only thing you had to do with the "9/11 rubble" was to print it on your book cover in Indonesian: "Seruan Azan Dari Puing WTC" ("A Call to Prayer from the World Trade Center Rubble"). Please clarify: Azan (summons for prayer) is only conducted from a minaret – a mosque – not a cultural center. You have worked tirelessly for peace. All you wanted was: "an icon [Cordoba Mosque]." My mother asked me: On God's green earth, there is no other place you can put a mosque except by the 9/11 rubble? And since we rejected the mosque idea, will the pool at your center allow Jews to swim, or were you kidding when you wrote the N.Y Times that Israel will be Judenrein (free of Jews)? I loved your romantic example on how to dialogue with Christians and Jews: "Deal with them as one courts a girl; stop thinking like a typical Muslim. Then you can engage." Just what is a "typical Muslim"? Did you use this romantic technique with Bloomberg? In one news report, you were dumbfounded that "Many American blogs print that Muslims want a Caliphate." This is like Arabs thinking that Saudi Arabia is Judenrein. Absurd, isn't it? I never knew that your Shariah was different from Anwar Awlaki's; just how many Shariahs are there? You say that Shariah is compatible with the U.S. Constitution – just to make sure, I compiled three questions. And just to assure you of my genuine intentions, I will not include typical ignorant stereotype questions about the funding for this noble "Cordoba peace center" or ask inflammatory questions regarding Caliphate, beheadings, killing of converts, amputation of limbs or lashings for certain sins and infractions. I will keep it strictly civil: Will marriage between Jewish men with Muslim women be protected by American Shariah law? (Yes, No) Will inheritance be distributed equally to males as well as females under American Shariah law? (Yes, No) Will the sale of mosque properties be allowed to include setting up places of worship for other faiths? (Yes, No) Finally, I was delighted that you now reconciled with Christians when you stated: "We all worship the same God." So I salute you in the name of Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God, my Lord and yours. Right? With best regards, Walid Shoebat

To: mph who wrote (90369)	9/4/2010 9:49:22 PM
From: lorne	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224718

U.N. legalizes child porn, prostitution September 04, 2010 wnd.com Consider the recent WND report on Scotland's opening up internet pornography to school children at lunch break thanks to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, currently un-ratified by the repressed USA. The U.N. "child rights" includes conditioning children to "consensual" prostitution and pornography, and the "right" to be used by any scoundrel they "chose." Protesting parents risk jail or the loony bin. Although the 2010 U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child language avoids the incendiary language of past years, the same child sex sale apparatus applies. "Article 1 (Definition of the child): The Convention defines a 'child' as a person below the age of 18, unless the laws of a particular country set the legal age for adulthood younger …" This deliberately allows any age child to be redefined as adult. Translation: Countries with legal prostitution or pornography and younger "age of adulthood," can sell legal child prostitution/pornography. "Rights" authors know adulthood may become any age, depending on the age of the partner(s). Spain's age of consent is now 13, pornography legal and prostitution effectively legal. Article 17 says: "(Access to information; mass media): Children have the right to get information that is important to their health and well-being …" Much international pornographic and fraudulent Planned Parenthood material masqueraded as sex education and AIDS prevention are said to be good for children's "health and well being." Similarly, "children's books" lie and sexually violate the child reader. Article 13 is the pornography access act: "The child shall have the right to freedom of expression … [to] receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of the child's choice." So a Scottish pedophile educator organizes access to "all" media for any age, one to 18. Free "expression … regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media," it's a child's choice. Article 15 gives children of any age "freedom of association and to freedom of peaceful assembly. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of these rights" if they are legal and don't violate public safety, etc. It is illegal for parents to stop children from bad actions, etc. Billions can be made via these child "protective" articles. Article 16: allows the lockup for parents who interfere with a pimp for children are protected against "arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy … honour and reputation." Article 24 provides "health care" family planning education and services, "abolishing traditional practices prejudicial to the health of children." Translation: child contraception, venereal vaccination and abortion as child "protections" in international care documents No "rights" identify sexually graphic images as "materials that could harm children." UNICEF folks as all good guys? In the Spring 1991 issue of the Journal of Pedophilia, the author laments the conviction of UNICEF's Belgian director for the child rape, torture, prostitution and pornography in the U.N. cellar lab. Pedophiles protested that, "Since the Dutroux [UNICEF] affaire in Belgium, television and the newspapers are full with news about pedophilia in a pejorative and negative way." Gosh, no American newspapers. Although the conviction of a notorious pedophile ring that regularly assaulted children in the official UNICEF basement could be of significant interest to Americans, neither UNICEF nor the U.S. press found this "news fit to print," protecting UNICEF's image and income. UNICEF has provided basic nutrition, water safety, sanitation, emergency services and the three Rs. However, UNICEF's "children's sexual rights" means the fox is guarding the chicken coop and eating well.