SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (35432)9/3/2010 4:08:14 PM
From: axial  Respond to of 46821
 
"It's been my point all along that perpetuating or prolonging a model based on artificial scarcity needn't be achieved through openly obvious and direct means, but instead by simply prolonging and reinforcing the life-cycles of the types of architectures that support manipulation, thus making it possible in the first place. Such models continue to prosper long after their original deployments, but most interestingly, they survive and flourish now even more so after their architectural shortcomings were first revealed in the context of present-day realities and requirements."

This goes to many issues discussed upstream, especially that of complexity itself. Thus, "Get out of the box." This is an idea that appalls many; it's equivalent to The Gordian Knot Solution. It's policy change.

More importantly, it's recognition that the mass of self-perpetuating and contradictory dynamics has become an excessive burden, a problem in its own right. It requires political courage and direction, as Australia, South Korea and others have demonstrated. Whether the requisite elements for change exist in the United States is unclear, but present evidence on financial reform and health care suggests the answer is "No."

There's no way to "evolve" out of the strangling snarl, not in our lifetimes. Law, regulation and jurisdictional separations all need to be rationalized before change can happen.

Jim



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (35432)10/28/2010 3:49:11 AM
From: axial  Respond to of 46821
 
High-speed Internet for rural areas pegged at $7-billion

It's really a question of policy,” said Teresa Griffin-Muir, vice-president of regulatory affairs at MTS, noting that in other countries, high-speed networks are “viewed as critical infrastructure.

theglobeandmail.com

Policy is the necessary predecessor. That's what the research establishes. Without new policy there will be no substantial improvement.

Message 23079388

Jim