Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Dollar and Under Sleeper Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (1843)	11/9/1997 8:11:00 PM
From: FARRIS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8835

Gary, You are generally correct, but PLRN's float has remained constant at 10 million for at least a year -- I believe longer. They are not selling shares, unless the transfer agent is lying about the float. (Doubt it.) Too bad if that $hit is happening to AVBC. I have been sitting on the sidelines -- cannot say I am sad I did yet -- too many irons in the fire right now. Eric

To: Ga Bard who wrote (1843)	11/9/1997 8:46:00 PM
From: Chartgod	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8835

GB.. You said: <Heck hard to find a solid company but they do exist you just have to dig deep with your research.> In a thread titled under $1.00 stocks? <big ass laugh> jim

To: Ga Bard who wrote (1843)	11/10/1997 8:56:00 AM
From: CO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8835

Ga Bard, I appreciate your comments and opinions on many things. I do respectfully disagree with you on a comment you made including FAMH. "plenty more that sell stock as shareholders are buying in and then intened to reverse it to get the shares down to a manageable level." This is not true in the case of FAMH. Yes FAMH sold 504K shares through Alexander Wescott to raise 1 Million dollars to expand their business and create even more revenues. They DID NOT increase the outstanding shares. They still only have 20 Million Total Outstanding Shares. The float was increased to 7 million. FAMH is a company that will likely show a profit for 1997 of around .12 - .15 EPS. I have a copy of their financials for the first six months and with their current outstanding shares, they were showing a profit of over .06 cents for JUST the first SIX months of 1997. The only way I can see that a roll-back might occur, is if it is needed to move to NASDAQ. In this case I don't think it is a bad move. With the profits that FAMH has and the increased revenue they should show in 1998, a move to NASDAQ should be quite beneficial. I think that any negative effect by the roll-back would be more than negated by the attention FAMH would receive by being listed. In my opinion, FAMH is one of the most solid, real business, OTC-BB stocks out there right now. Here is an updated thread for more information on FAMH. Subject 18031 Good Luck, Cheryl