Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grusum who wrote (90412)	9/5/2010 9:28:10 AM
From: TideGlider	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224724

I am more concerned with double voting of bums driven around by publicly funded groups like ACORN than I am for voters falling for double talk. Angle needs to be more clear about abortion in the case of rape or incest and it had better be that she condones it. That is an "angle", no pun that has been reported by the left that some claim to be misrepresented, however, I haven't seen a clarification of that issue. Abortion shouldn't be an issue in which the Reid, Pelosi, Obama Trinity are framed. It certainly has nothing to do with the harm done to the nation and the economy by their policies and yet evokes responses at many levels that could affect an election. Very late term abortion, especially the despicable intentionally mislabeled practice of partial birth abortion is an issue on which any politician from and side of the aisle could stand against. However, making abortion an issue or allowing it be made an issue in an election when abortion isn't on the legislative menu is simply providing opportunities for the savage tax and spend politicians to cake walk through smoke screens. I believe the left has successfully dropped this smoke for harry Reid and if Angle doesn't successfully clear that smoke the real issues will be ignored my many knee jerk voters.