Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chartgod who wrote (201)	11/9/1997 10:22:00 PM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11708

One of the reasons I waited so long to get on SI is all the flaming that I see. I'm no different than any other investor. I want to see my position increase. As I said, I've had a modest position for about five months and added modestly the past few weeks as the stock was beaten up. I have not just jumped in and decided to pump the stock. TO ALL: I intentionally posted the most benign message to avoid the flaming. Yet still, I got it. Ask yourselves again, who would attack the language in posts 196,197. We are all adults here. I am not suggesting that everyone BUY, BUY, BUY with their children's college money. If your DD validates a stock worth more than a half a buck, buy; if not, then don't. Moreover, my primary advice was for all longs to ask for their certificates. Now, again, who could possibly be upset with that request? TraderGreg

To: Chartgod who wrote (201)	11/9/1997 10:38:00 PM
From: charles messick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11708

James, I've been chewing and stewing on this stock for the last few days. While there are not very many posts to analyze over time and get a solid feel for what is truly happening with this stock, my gut(or could that be greed?) feeling is that this is probably a legit opportunity. There unfortunately is not a whole lot of info available that I have found. Some of the posts make me very nervous. I think it's the high pitched delivery. You know a little like some one who desperatly needs to sell an idea. What I have found so far seems to confirm some of the statements that have been made. I think I have my course charted but your posts have the taste of some one who knows something more. You seem to be warning of something and your short profile activity doesn't set off any alarms for me....sooooo. would you take a couple of minuites and tell the other lurkers and myself why you are concerned. I am not invested ....yet. Thank you, Chuck Messick P.S. Please e-mail if you prefer.

To: Chartgod who wrote (201)	11/10/1997 7:15:00 AM
From: David Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11708

James, I would like you to do something novel. Please post your reasons that you do not like this stock. Did you do any research? I'd like to know why you have such a passionate displeasure of this stock and the posters who discuss it? James, this discussion board is here to discuss stocks, not posters. As a matter of fact, the #1 rule for the use of this board is that postings cannot include the following: 1.Posting messages that include personal attacks... As a matter of fact, I was so irritated by your condescending posts against TraderGreg (who is a brand new member who didn't join for a long time because of these personal attacks) that I emailed the Webmistress and asked her to evaluate your posts and see if it warrants termination. I thought about it overnight and I don't want your membership to be terminated. What I want is for you to discuss stocks and give useful information to this investment community without directing comments about any individual poster. Is that too much to ask for? Am I off base? Your comments would be greatly appreciated. No more personal attacks, okay? David