SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pierrot who wrote (9842)9/11/2010 10:28:16 AM
From: briskit2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 222226
 
Nobody misted your insulting point, that's why you got those responses. If you are smart enough to have taken a phylosophy exam, then you already know that and are pretending otherwise. You could be Obama's vice-president!



To: pierrot who wrote (9842)9/11/2010 10:32:20 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™1 Recommendation  Respond to of 222226
 
Are you still here? GET LOST, MAGGOT!!!

Oh, and have a nice day, won't you...<g>

GZ



To: pierrot who wrote (9842)9/12/2010 1:21:51 PM
From: Al Greenleaf4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 222226
 
You are incorrect. You asserted that Americans were belligerent people, with a list of military actions as your only proof. That list DID include WWII and the rescue of France.

If ever you have a chance to read past the headlines, you will find for example, that we freed Grenada, but did not acquire it. We invaded Panama, and them turned the canal over to their new government. Yes, we invaded Iraq, perhaps mistakenly, but the pinheads who claim that we were "there for the oil" do not realize that we have NO control over their oil, and that we have brought in far more oil and gasoline, than we have taken out.

Ergo, you are incorrect.