To: i-node who wrote (585211 ) 9/18/2010 2:10:42 PM From: combjelly Respond to of 1573004 "I really have no statistics to support your claim. " That is because you haven't looked. "In the years before the crisis, the behavior of lenders changed dramatically. Lenders offered more and more loans to higher-risk borrowers,[74] including undocumented immigrants.[75] Subprime mortgages amounted to $35 billion (5% of total originations) in 1994,[76] 9% in 1996,[77] $160 billion (13%) in 1999,[76] and $600 billion (20%) in 2006.[77][78][79] A study by the Federal Reserve found that the average difference between subprime and prime mortgage interest rates (the "subprime markup") declined significantly between 2001 and 2007. The combination of declining risk premia and credit standards is common to boom and bust credit cycles.[80]"en.wikipedia.org And most of the loans were written by entities that the CRA didn't apply to.Some economists, politicians and other commentators[who?] have charged that the CRA contributed in part to the 2008 financial crisis by encouraging banks to make unsafe loans. Government economists, such as those from the Federal Reserve and the FDIC, dispute this contention. The Federal Reserve, having examined the evidence, holds that empirical research has not validated any relationship between the CRA and the 2008 financial crisis[100]. At the FDIC, Chair Sheila Bair delivered remarks noting that the majority of subprime loans originated from lenders not regulated by the CRA, calling it a "scapegoat" and declaring it "NOT guilty."[101] ....Some legal and financial experts note that CRA regulated loans tend to be safe and profitable, and that subprime excesses came mainly from institutions not regulated by the CRA. In the February 2008 House hearing, law professor Michael S. Barr, a Treasury Department official under President Clinton,[67][113] stated that a Federal Reserve survey showed that affected institutions considered CRA loans profitable and not overly risky. He noted that approximately 50% of the subprime loans were made by independent mortgage companies that were not regulated by the CRA, and another 25% to 30% came from only partially CRA regulated bank subsidiaries and affiliates. en.wikipedia.org "That you asked this question just reeks of ignorance of the subject matter." Umm, right. Your reply just shows how ignorant you are of the real causes.