SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (25744)11/10/1997 12:58:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580109
 
Jozef,

<AMD and Cyrix can't compete in multiprocessor server market, because
their chips don't support multiprocessing. But question is, what is
the percentage of servers that require multiple processors?>

AMD and Cyrix chips do support multiprocessing based on a joint MPU
spec agreeded on by both companies. The problem is they are not
competitive, noone uses them.

<The market for servers that don't require multiple processors is big enough, probably bigger than multiprocessor market. There is no reason why AMD or Cyrix chips cannot be used.>

Please list the AMD or Cyrix servers currently on the market. I can't
find any. Why do you suppose that is?

Are you entilted to a refund for your bug riddled K6?

techweb.com

EP



To: Joe NYC who wrote (25744)11/10/1997 2:48:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1580109
 
Jozef - Re: "he market for servers that don't require multiple processors is big enough, probably bigger than multiprocessor market. "

According to International Data Corp. (IDC), the market for Intel-based servers, costing less than $25,000 consisted of 33% single processor units, 55% Dual (2-way) processor units and 12% Quad (4-way) processor systems.

This was for the period of Q297.

For comparison, in Q196 , the distribution was 60% (1-way), 31% (2-way), and 9% (4-way).

Clearly, the trend is toward more CPUs/server.

Pau