SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (25754)11/10/1997 2:14:00 AM
From: Investor A  Respond to of 1579136
 
John,

One thing is for sure that K6-208Mhz (83x2.5) is noticeable faster than PMMX-250 (83x3) to work with even PMMX has better IO performance.

PMMX perform quite well with all benchmarks. However, PMMX is slower to work with real life application due to the stolen technologies were by well digested by Intel. Whenever there is a cache hit, PMMX would take twice time to response when comparing to K6 or M2.



To: Petz who wrote (25754)11/10/1997 2:55:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579136
 
Petz - Re: "This means the K6 at 266 will be close to matching the performance of the overpriced P2-300."

It may be close.

Is AMD close to shipping any 266 MHz K6's?

Paul