Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (382571)	9/15/2010 1:53:55 AM
From: Neeka	Respond to of 794041

I guess we'll know soon enough whether voters trust Coons more than O'Donnel to, more often than not, make the best choices for Delaware. even if Castle was to the left of where they'd like him to be — they generally like him as a dude, and trusted him to make the best choice for Delaware more often than not.

To: LindyBill who wrote (382571)	9/15/2010 3:59:43 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	5 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794041

People will focus on O’Donnell for obvious reasons. But I think the real story, and the point Rush and others were getting at is: The results tonight in Delaware are about Mike Castle. He had an R. after his name, but he might as well have been a Democrat. Voters want authenticity. That’s why Murkowski lost. That’s why Castle lost. Yes. The Republican establishment should get the message: Voters want a U-turn election. They are in no mood to make deals with RINOs just to get the numbers. As far as they are concerned, having the numbers without the principles is exactly what got us into this trouble in the first place. I'm glad she won even though it is likely to cost Republicans the seat. The Republican establishment needs a good scare.