SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: russet who wrote (23417)9/15/2010 7:51:10 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86352
 
Sunlight hitting the dark discs could power the whole world:

If you ignore redundancy needs, transmission losses, and future growth in needs.

And when you look at the world map those dark disks don't look so big.

But they are huge. Add up the "required area" for all of them and its almost as much area as Pakistan. Add in more for the factors I mention above, and your probably up to about the size of at least Mexico.

Can you imagine trying to cover ALL OF MEXICO with solar cells or solar thermal equipment? Ignoring the land cost and economic disruption how much do you think that would cost?



To: russet who wrote (23417)9/15/2010 7:58:38 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Respond to of 86352
 
We (Canada) would need to invade the US and carve out a southerly extension in the name of energy sovereignty ... Couldn't count on their 'black spot' :O)



To: russet who wrote (23417)9/15/2010 10:27:16 PM
From: Eric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86352
 
Sorry but your numbers are wrong.

System efficiencies of 8%?

Sounds like solar cells from the 1960's!

You obviously have never worked with photovoltaics!