Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (144460)	9/17/2010 11:33:34 PM
From: Little Joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541652

In elections it is always a choice between a few candidates. If your choice is between someone who you think will vote the way you want and improve the situation and someone who will vote against your wishes and make the situation worse, the factors you mention become secondary. Now if the choice is between two candidates who will vote your way then those issues become more important. For example, I believe Hank Paulson produced revenue, paid taxes and made his own money, but I wouldn't want him in government. Not because I believe him to be dumb, but since I believe the interests he represents are bad for U.S. and he will word for those interests, the other doesn't matter. By the way your position on O'Donnell suggests that you think Welfare Moms would all be bad candidates. Am I wrong? Also, I would remind you some very successful people have gone through difficult times. seattle-washington-bankruptcy-lawyer.com lj