SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (586141)9/18/2010 11:51:47 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1578927
 
Internet kill switch on the Senate's short agenda:

September 15, 2010 by Bob Livingston

The Internet Kill Switch Bill I’ve told you about before (here, here, here and here) continues to evolve and is creeping closer to reality.

According to Moneycontrol.com, two separate bills — one pushed by Senators Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Thomas Carper (D-Del.) and another backed by Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) — have been combined and are now on the Senate’s short list for passage.
The new bill would give the power to shut down the Internet in case of national emergency to the Department of Homeland Security. Under the bill the Internet could be closed down for four months before Congress could review it. The bill would also require cybersecurity professionals be certified.

The elected elites couch the bill as necessary for national security, but Lieberman let slip the real reason when he told CNN’s Candy Crowley, “Right now China — the government — can disconnect parts of its Internet in a case of war. We need to have the ability to do that, too.”

Of course, China disconnects portions of the Internet whenever there’s civil strife, as do other totalitarian regimes. It’s done to suppress the flow of information. Elites hate the free flow of information.

Rockefeller has gone so far to say he wishes the Internet had never been invented and we still communicated with paper and pencil.

Senate aides told Moneycontrol.com the bill faces a number of hurdles but the goal is to get the bill passed and on President Barack Obama’s desk by the end of the year. The bill could come up in the next four weeks, or it could be much later, aides said.

This bill is about one thing: The totalitarian suppression of free speech. The elites and corporate press know they have lost control of the message. This has resulted in the rise of the Tea Party and general discontent over the direction of the American political system. That frightens the fascists on both sides of the aisle.

The Internet Kill Switch Bill is their effort to regain control.

personalliberty.com



To: bentway who wrote (586141)9/18/2010 12:02:24 PM
From: d[-_-]b1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1578927
 
In retrospect, Saddam was doing a GREAT job of holding that unlikely shithole country together..


If we could gas people and hang them from light poles I bet we could control them even better too.

Imagine how much better it would have been if we had just kept Saddam in his box.

Odumbo would be over their apologizing for all the UN sanctions and saddam would telling him to come out of the islamic closet.



To: bentway who wrote (586141)9/18/2010 12:06:11 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578927
 
yeah putting people into shredders has that effect.Tying people to telephones on the street and cutting out their tongues does seem to keep the masses quite.

Hanging women upside down naked in the street while they are having their period seems to finally shut them up



To: bentway who wrote (586141)9/18/2010 12:57:19 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578927
 
Attaway, praise Saddam - he kept the Arabs in his country in line. There's not a mass killer or genocial madman in the modern world that our liberal-progressives don't love.