Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carolyn who wrote (383294)	9/18/2010 4:48:29 PM
From: SmoothSail	7 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 794591

He is not against her. If that is so, why is he pounding on her? Why isn't he pounding on what a Marxist her opponent is? Why isn't he making comparisons to the positions she's taking emphasizing the negative stance of her opponent? As someone said earlier - Rove is all about Rove. He didn't pick the right one this time and he's doing a backward moonwalk to try and retrieve his creds.

To: Carolyn who wrote (383294)	9/18/2010 8:02:44 PM
From: steve harris	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794591

O'Reilly wants to stay "connected" to the beltway. After O'Donnell won, Rove should be steering the conversation to O'Donnell's opponent. Like "well, O'Donnell we've learned is an American who has had problems in her life, like all of us. Her fellow Delaware voters understand this, and that is why she is the best choice for Delaware's newest senator, not Coons, the marxist who is Reid's pet and Obama's lapdog." Then go on to highlight the differences between O'Donnell and her marxist opponent. Rove's career is over imho.