SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (66179)9/18/2010 6:56:37 PM
From: KyrosL8 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218377
 
And let's not forget the 40 million "missing" Chinese female babies.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (66179)9/18/2010 7:00:54 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218377
 
team america's drug habit is the root cause of massive hurt in mexico and too many points south

trust i am making my point?



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (66179)9/18/2010 7:23:10 PM
From: TobagoJack3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218377
 
back to:

<<... Lao Mong Hay, ... Asian Human Rights Commission in Hong Kong>>

... that would be freedom hong kong to you.

<<... According to Mong Hay, China had donated $1 billion to Democratic Kampuchea before 1979 and another billion dollars after 1979 in order to fight the Vietnamese invasion...>>

... helping cambodians to defend against american and vietnamese invaders was wrong? or that cambodia spawned the only organized pol pot force to do so was china's fault? or that it was right for america and vietnam to invade cambodia? what is your spin?

<<... All nations (including the US), in pursuing their economic and security interests, are guilty of engaging in policies that have resulted in oppression and/or genocide, even if at a localized, tribal, level. We must accept the blame for that..>>

.. you singularly fail to do so. in truth you champion more, and much more of the same, and is proud to do so.

For China to mature into becoming a responsible member of the international community, they must, as well, accept their responsibility where their policies have led to atrocities by their client states.

.. so what is your excuse for team usa's failure to mature?

... Ultimately, being a non-democratic government, China also has no interest in promoting pluralist government. Bejing's only agenda is regional influence and economic exploitation.

... meaningless gibberish given that team america is responsible for most of the influence peddling and economic exploitation around the world via its military and fiat currency. you were trying to be funny, yes?

And isn't it also ironic that Bejing, seeing democracy as not critical for their society, freely benefits from it in the democratic UN, with the power to veto any resolution to boot.

... and so now you are blaming the chinese for convoluting the non-demo structuring of the un, or are you upset that team usa, having convoluted the non-demo structuring of the un has lost some degree of control over the processing?

let us see what happens next re the similarly convoluted imf.

you really have no shame.


<<Now go away and don't bother this thread with your ramblings and delusional historical inaccuracies.>>

... oh, yes, great hamoon, i think i shall think about obeying your command of the situation and way of engaging with differing views.

thought over. no intention to stand down on all of your stance re echelon, invasions, killings, and interpretation of histories, and never mind your mind over macro this and investment that.

certainly appears that you are having a trying time alignming your stories and calibrating your utterings.

what fun.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (66179)9/18/2010 7:42:49 PM
From: TobagoJack3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218377
 
<<Now go away and don't bother this thread with your ramblings and delusional historical inaccuracies>>

... this is particularly funny and so very typical of your ilk. did you notice who is that thread moderator who adopted a very freedom hong kong approach to thread management? do you wish to do a regime change? to silence others of differing views?

how typical, but i noted that already.