To: Feline who wrote (6 ) 11/10/1997 8:59:00 PM From: Grant Baker Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20
Feline, don't be put off by the rambling, disjointed nature of Chuck's commentary - we are old SI buddies on other threads for almost a year now, so I have learned to decifer the babble a bit....If you carefully wade through Chuck's posts he sometimes has a valid point to make, but for the uninitiated the effort can be very taxing. (At least now he is no longer SCREAMING!.....<VBG>) If I read him correctly, Chuck's concern is the lack of quantifiable data from both GIT and ROM at this point, ie. assays from grab samples or trenching, let alone drill core. Although I haven't followed this play for long, from my perspective I think that it is still very early in the game here so I am not as concerned about that issue just yet. Let's wait and see what kind of results GIT starts to produce, and then see if they are trending over to ROM's property...... For me at least, it is the fact that ROM has managed to acquire this particular parcel that interests me right now. Since GIT has apparently continued to stake all around ROM's property, it would appear that ROM might have acquired a key piece of the local geography in a very good location, and as you probably know, location is very important in this game. You indicated on the GIT thread that you have much to offer in the way of information about RMO. Care to share a bit more than what you have hinted at so far? It sounds like you have followed this Peruvian play for a while - what was it that peaked your interest about this play, or these companies? How did you first come to learn about them, and what is it about them that continues to hold your interest? Looking forward to your reply.