Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (91425)	9/21/2010 10:49:57 AM
From: tonto	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224750

Oh, you want a non-thinker. If he does not do what the party tells him to do he has turned his back on your party. You applauded him when he did not go with the vast majority of democrats in the decision to fund the war in Iraq. So what you are saying is that he turned his back on the party back then too...

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (91425)	9/21/2010 11:08:13 AM
From: Hope Praytochange	Respond to of 224750

Odumbama dropped the harsher rhetoric he has employed against Wall Street. "The only thing that we’ve said is that we’ve got to make sure that we’re not doing some of the same things we were doing in the past that got us into this mess in the first place. When I mention changes in the financial services industry, it is very important for us not to find ourselves in a position in which banks get too big to fail, and if they make bad decisions, taxpayers have to bail them out or we let the entire economy collapse. That’s not a choice that I want any future president to have to make," Odumbama said. Gone were the references to "fat cats" and the "battalions of financial industry lobbyists descending on Capitol Hill."