SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (586886)9/22/2010 10:30:34 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1575597
 
Parting of Red Sea Linked to Ma Nature, Not Moses

COMPUTER SIMULATION DUPLICATES 'MIRACLE' WITH HEAVY WIND, SHALLOW LAGOON

By Mary Papenfuss, Newser Staff
newser.com
( Ten doesn't believe men can influence economic cycles, but believes in THIS! Go figure..)
Posted Sep 22, 2010 2:37 AM CDT

(NEWSER) – The parting of the Red Sea during the Israelites' exodus from Eqypt usually attributed to Moses could have been nothing more than a natural phenomenon, not a miracle, says a team of researchers. Colorado scientists have created a computer simulation revealing that a strong east wind blowing overnight over a shallow lagoon off northern Egypt could expose mud flats for four hours. In Exodus 14 of the Bible, Moses parts the water so the Israelites can flee the pharaoh's soldiers, who are swallowed up when they follow.

"The parting of the waters can be understood through fluid dynamics," explained study lead author Carl Drews. "The wind moves the water in a way that's in accordance with physical laws, creating a safe passage with water on two sides and then abruptly allowing the water to rush back in." A similar situation was described by an British army officer in 1882 who witnessed the lagoon "disappearing" for hours after gale-force winds, notes the New York Daily News.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (586886)9/22/2010 7:56:12 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575597
 
>Really? You're used to 4.5% unemployment?

>Last two times that happened, recession hit a few years later.

There have been lots of recessions in the history of the country. You're implying that recessions are due to high employment?

>Ups and downs in the economy is the norm. Get used to it.

A down like this is pretty rare. I refuse to get used to it.

-Z