SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (587261)9/24/2010 10:27:34 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574852
 
>> OR AT LEAST TOO MUCH RICHER THAN THE POOR. STUDY FINDS 92% PREFER SWEDISH MODEL

I agree.

The Walton family is too rich.

They also employee 2.1 million unskilled, otherwise unemployable people in this country.



To: bentway who wrote (587261)9/24/2010 10:32:33 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1574852
 
selfish jealous people. give me a dollar



To: bentway who wrote (587261)9/24/2010 12:04:06 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574852
 
Bentway, > The people polled by the Harvard Business School researchers—a randomly selected sample representing various income groups—were asked to choose between unlabeled pie charts showing America's distribution of wealth and Sweden's, where the richest 20% control only 36% of the country's wealth. Asked which of the two they'd rather live in, 92% preferred Sweden's wealth distribution.

Replace Sweden with Cuba, North Korea, or any other communist country and you might get a different response.

The billionaire founder of Facebook just donated $100M to NJ schools. Maybe the Harvard researchers can poll people and ask whether he should have a billion dollars in the first place.

Tenchusatsu



To: bentway who wrote (587261)9/24/2010 12:45:29 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1574852
 
A couple liberal professors hired an online survey company to do a sample telling them that Americans really do want socialism and wealth redistribution after all. Yawn.



To: bentway who wrote (587261)9/26/2010 3:45:28 PM
From: average joe1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574852
 
“Redistribution” of Wealth

If a man proposes to redistribute wealth, he means explicitly and necessarily that the wealth is his to distribute. If he proposes it in the name of the government, then the wealth belongs to the government; if in the name of society, then it belongs to society. No one, to my knowledge, did or could define a difference between that proposal and the basic principle of communism.

“The Dead End,” The Ayn Rand Letter, I, 20, AR



To: bentway who wrote (587261)9/27/2010 8:37:51 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1574852
 
No the poll doesn't show that 92% prefer the Swedish model. It shows that 92% prefer one specific possible result from the Swedish model in the context of Sweden, which likely would not be the result here even if we tried copying their policies.

Preferring their model would either mean preferring the model for its own sake, or preferring the total combination of results. They study just found people like the idea of more income equality, not that they find the Swedish model to be better.