To: donpat who wrote (2351 ) 9/24/2010 12:45:15 PM From: scion Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53574 Yes sir. The authors company name is embedded in both files. Remember how the FBI caught BTK? Same way. The authors computer information is also embedded in both files. The authors compnay name/website is registered to the same person. The site it was posted on and messages by the same person directed people to the websites which is also registered to the same person. The brochure was promptly deleted when pointed out that it was illegal. As for distibution of the illegal brochure, not only was it physically printed, the author admitted to distributing it to lawyers and doctors offices and there were hits on the web site. jjsmith Friday, September 24, 2010 9:19:52 AM Re: BRIG_88 post# 70871 Post # of 70959 I never said JBI issued any brochure and you know that. Hans Brost is the creator of the illegal brochure and I already posted that. Quote: Brochure? Do you have a link to a brochure JBII issued?siliconinvestor.com zardiw Share Friday, September 24, 2010 11:09:25 AM Re: jjsmith post# 70931 Post # of 70960 Who is that?...And can you prove that?...And MOSTLY, what is the relevance?......Seems to me that 'brochure' is just a copy/paste of the IBox over a year ago....and the only MISTAKE in it is a missing WORD that makes the APPROXIMATE EPS (which was based on the NUMBERS in the 10Q!!!)....Annualized/Projected.....Big EFFING DEAL........zsiliconinvestor.com jjsmith Share Friday, September 24, 2010 12:38:32 PM Re: zardiw post# 70947 Post # of 70960 Yes sir. The authors company name is embedded in both files. Remember how the FBI caught BTK? Same way. The authors computer information is also embedded in both files. The authors compnay name/website is registered to the same person. The site it was posted on and messages by the same person directed people to the websites which is also registered to the same person. The brochure was promptly deleted when pointed out that it was illegal. As for distibution of the illegal brochure, not only was it physically printed, the author admitted to distributing it to lawyers and doctors offices and there were hits on the web site. There is much more false information in the brochure like the following: Quote: 2. Bordynuik has a very profitable private company, John Bordynuik Inc. (JBI) that reads the 'unreadable', i.e. the over 50 million computer tapes from the early computer era (60's-80's). There is a wealth of information on those tapes, and he developed his own tape drives to read these degraded tapes. This is and has always been false. All public records of the tape business show it had losses every quarter. Making people believe the tape business was profitable is what started the whole process. Six Months Ended January 31, 2009 Year ended July 31, 2008 Year ended July 31, 2007 (unaudited) (audited) (audited) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Revenues $ 1,637 $ 90,536 $ 49,574 Cost of Services 41,472 79,845 29,949 General and Administrative Expenses 533,364 451,452 111.867 Net Income (561,642) (445,696) (101,283) google.brand.edgar-online.com Quote: They are currently processing about 700 tapes a day, but will be processing many more due to 70 new tape drives coming online. All public data shows they may have processed 700 tapes for 2 days at most. The statement also implies they do this on a regular basis which based on the very little revenues the tape business ever had, is false. Quote: The company is profitable with an approximate .18 EPS This is false. There is no missing word. It clearly says " the company is profitable". No grey area here. Very clear. Quote: Financials: Assets: $22,486,751, Liabilities: $5,831,189 This is also false. Any reasonable due dilegence would have discovered the media credits being over valued by $9-10 million. The company has since admitted this in SEC filings. Quote: 5. The whole process will be franchised across the country/world. The first franchise has already been bought. What franshise was bough at the time this was created? I can't find any. Quote: Latest 10Q (Note that this 10Q represents only 2 days of revenue This statement was made with the clear intent to make people believe that the company produced the revenues for the 2 day period on a regular basis even though it was clear that those 2 day revenues in no way shape or form reflect an average daily revenue or anything close. In fact the average revenues of the tape business for in the last 5 years has only been around $136/day. If you average the toal revenues of about $250K by 5 years that is the number you come up with. No where near the two days reported and implied daily revenue of the tape business. Quote: In addition, for an additional one million shares of restricted common stock, the Company acquired approximately $10 million in U.S. radio and newspaper prepaid advertising covering 10,000 newspapers and 6000 radio stations. This statement in the same brochure proved that the above asset value of the company was false. The stock was trading around $1 at the time so the most the media credits could be claimed to be worth was $1 million. Need anymore proof? Quote: Who is that?...And can you prove that?...And MOSTLY, what is the relevance?......Seems to me that 'brochure' is just a copy/paste of the IBox over a year ago....and the only MISTAKE in it is a missing WORD that makes the APPROXIMATE EPS (which was based on the NUMBERS in the 10Q!!!)....Annualized/Projected.....Big EFFING DEAL........zsiliconinvestor.com