To: TobagoJack who wrote (66486 ) 9/25/2010 11:29:07 PM From: Hawkmoon 4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219938 enough americans believed that america had opportunity to march upto and beyond the yalu river and voiced as such Hey Bimbo.. Russian, Chinese, and NK fighter planes were being based in airfields across the Yalu river, so you would have deserved to have UN forces cross to destroy them. Furthermore, supplies from China and Russia for NK were streaming across the Yalu bridges, again justifying military action. China had NO LEGAL RIGHT, in the eyes of the UN, to be assisting the aggression by NK against SK. On the other hand the UN forces had EVERY RIGHT to occupy NK as punishment for it's aggression (ala Iraq). Again, this was because Bejing wanted that "buffer" (just as the Soviets wanted Europe to be their buffer) against any contact with the democratic west. And that's the very same reason that they continue to provide political cover for the intransigent regime in Pyongyang to this day.enough americans believed that america had opportunity to march upto and beyond the yalu river and voiced as such And Mao thought it was "extremely favorable" to China to enter the war:2. The adoption of our active policy mentioned above is extremely favorable to China, Korea, the East, and the world. If we do not send troops [to Korea], the reactionaries at home and abroad will be swollen with arrogance when the enemy troops press to the Yalu River border. Consequently, it will be unfavorable to various parties and especially unfavorable to Northeast China. [In such a situation,] the entire Northeast Frontier Force will be tied down and the power supplies in South Manchuria will be controlled [by hostile parties]. In short, we hold that we should enter the war. We must enter the war. Entering the war is greatly to our advantage; it is greatly to our disadvantage if we do not enter the war. Mao worried about the power generation on the Yalu river and the impact on his government's stability if the West pushed to the Yalu river. So instead of negotiating more strongly to bring down the NK regime (even if it meant replacing it with another communist leader) Mao chose to intervene militarily. His choice, as was the choice to call them "Chinese volunteers" as cover. From the CinC of UN Command:The Korean war was brought to a practical end with the closing of the trap on enemy elements north of Pyongyang and seizure of the east coastal area.... The defeat of the North Koreans and destruction of their armies was thereby decisive. In the face of this victory of United Nations arms, the Communists committed one of the most offensive acts of international lawlessness of historic record by moving without any notice of belligerency elements of alien Communist forces across the Yalu River into North Korea and massing a great concentration of possible reinforcing divisions with adequate supply behind the privileged sanctuary of the adjacent Manchurian border. A possible trap was thereby surreptitiously laid, calculated to encompass the destruction of the United Nations forces engaged in restoring order and the processes of civil government in the North Korean border area. oah.org So "Team China/Russia" committed themselves to wage a war against the United Nations forces and paid dearly for it (though UN forces suffered far fewer, but still significant losses). And "Team China" seems to be STILL committed to preserving the NK regime. As for the tactics used in waging war against the North Korean aggression, those were the days when strategic bombing against civilian population centers was still politically "palatable". Yet, for some reason Russia, China, Britain, France, and the US all have nuclear weapons targeted at one another to accomplish the very same purpose, kill civilians in mass quantities to destroy the industrial capacity and political will of each other's populations. War is hell.. let there be no doubt about that. And many war should be so bloody so that politicians and dictators don't enter into it lightly. And when a nation wages war, they'd better be in it to win fully. Let us hope that neither the Chinese government, nor the US, permit either of our countries to come to such a state of affairs again. Hawk