SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (276366)9/28/2010 4:58:58 PM
From: Sun Tzu3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Reread the original article you posted and tell us what was the main theme of the article. What message did the author try to get across?

ST



To: TimF who wrote (276366)9/28/2010 10:51:52 PM
From: Garden Rose1 Recommendation  Respond to of 281500
 
Tim, I think we agree but may not be saying it in the same way. I base this on your comment: "Excluding the possibility of actual forcible rape, then I'd say any felony conviction for "rape by fraud" would probably be "unfair". I don't consider lying a bout who you are to get sex, to be rape. And he may not have even done that, which would make the conviction even more unreasonable.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News