Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (587975)	9/29/2010 2:01:52 PM
From: TimF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575361

You mention nothing about the effects on millions of people. Anything that would balance the budget, or even move us in that direction to a significant degree, would have negative effects on a lot of people (even if its overall effect is positive). Your asked for a post about what I would do to reduce the budget deficit, what spending I would cut. You want to give me a large advance to write a book, then I might try to write chapters about the various effects each change would have. You often ask for a level of detail that you yourself do not provide. In this case your retroactively asking for it, and implying its a failure on my part that I didn't comply with the request that you had not made yet. That's unreasonable. folks are not being allowed to continue to work much beyond 60 yet alone beyond 65 That isn't generally true, even though it is true for specific people. And people live longer and longer they are going to have to work to an older age, or we are going to have to have an explosion in productivity for younger people, or we going to have severe problems going forward. as a member of the group that constantly harasses the poorer people BS