Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (588004)	9/29/2010 12:35:17 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1578469

The Pew survey is Trivial Pursuit: World Religion. If you know who Maimonides, Mother Teresa, Martin Luther were, if you can identify the Dalai Lama as Buddhist and Indonesia as a Muslim country, you'll do well. What that has to do with God or your own religion, the answer is not much. BTW contrary to the news articles evangelical Protestants and Mormons scored higher on the Christian part of the exam than did atheists and agnostics. You can't believe the media's reporting.

To: Alighieri who wrote (588004)	9/30/2010 12:06:53 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578469

Atheism and Indifference Ross Douthat Daniel Larison and Jamelle Bouie both have sharp posts analyzing the much-discussed Pew finding that atheists and agnostics (and Mormons and Jews) tend to score higher on tests of religious literacy than many self-described Catholics, evangelicals, and mainline Protestants. The only thing I’d add to their analysis is this: I wonder how the data would have looked if Pew had created a generic “nonbeliever” category and compared that group to Protestants and Catholics. Instead, they created two categories: Self-described atheists/agnostics, and people who described their religion as “nothing in particular.” The first group was 3 percent of the sample; the second group was a much larger 12 percent. And while the atheist/agnostics had the highest religious literacy, the larger “nothing in particular” camp was among the least literate overall. This makes a great deal of sense. The very act of declaring yourself an “atheist,” after all, suggests a particularly high level of interest in religious detail and debate — higher than many self-described Methodists or cradle Catholics who have a vague belief in God and show up at church on holidays, and also higher than the many nonbelievers who are merely indifferent to religion. Another way of putting it is that self-described atheists are the religious converts of the irreligious world. Like someone who leaps from Lutheranism to Catholicism, or Christianity to Islam, they’ve made an intellectual decision about their faith — or the lack thereof, that is. And so it isn’t surprising that they’d be more knowledgeable about the subject than the much larger populations of part-time churchgoers and “nothing in particular” nonpractitioners alike. douthat.blogs.nytimes.com