Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (38697)	9/29/2010 8:10:09 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 103300

Showing America that they side with wealthy CEO's and not investors, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation's biggest business lobby, and the Business Roundtable sued the Securities and Exchange Commission today, to overturn a rule that makes it easier for investors to oust corporate directors, Businessweek reported today. The two groups decided to sue after completing a legal analysis of the regulation, they said at a news conference in Washington. The rule, which allows shareholders owning 3 percent of a company to nominate board members on corporate ballots, was passed by a divided SEC last month. “These rules are wholly unnecessary,” said David Hirschmann, president of the chamber's Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness. “This special interest-driven rule will give small groups of special-interest activist investors significant leverage over business activities.” The SEC, in a 3-2 vote, stipulated that investors or groups of shareholders who have owned 3 percent of a company for three years could have board candidates on proxy statements. SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro has said the 2008 credit crisis, which cost financial firms more than $1.82 trillion, shows shareholders need more clout in picking board members to oversee companies. Interestingly, these new rules only make it possible to nominate board candidates, and shareholders still must approve the candidates on a proxy, which means that the Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce are afraid of letting shareholders vote for their choices for board members. Under the regulation, shareholders would be able to nominate at least one director and as much as 25 percent of a board. Investors couldn't use the rule if their intent is to oust a majority of board members and take over a company. This lawsuit shows the contempt that the Roundtable, and U.S Chamber of Commerce have for investors, since experts have written that poor corporate boards not only contributed to the financial crisis but are and epidemic that is causing the USA to be non-competitive. I think the crux of the problem is that American corporate boards practice lax oversight and cronyism in general. I previously wrote about this problem in an article entitled, Boards of Directors – 60 Ways to Screw Your Shareholders, here at Benzinga. ( benzinga.com ) benzinga.com