Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Justa and Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (5634)	9/30/2010 10:18:08 AM
From: rsie	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10065

then argue the facts that are current. don't continue to bring up tired old, very old arguments. hey things change. very quickly. you and kirk (self promoter) and another one that is selling, very hard his wares, have to be current. I may respect your arguments, if and only if you stay current. stay relevant. please.

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (5634)	9/30/2010 4:29:49 PM
From: Boca_PETE	2 Recommendations Respond to of 10065

what Pete said about me? That post said NOTHING about you - It asked you, in a multiple choice question, to identify yourself with the choices that most closely describe what you meant when YOU SAID "I do not believe Brinker". Message 26854732 How could I "be utterly wrong" about the post if YOU chose to identify what you meant in a subsequent response to that post? Moreover, which word in I2's post is about you personally? Message 26856707 My understanding of I2's post was that it represented his opinion about what he concluded about the complaints some post about Bob Brinker. He seemed to think I had covered most of them well in my original post to you. How is that in any way critical of you? It has nothing to do with you personally so why are you taking it personally? Are you an overly SENSitive person? P "The eye that alters, alters all" - Robert Blake, English Poet