SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (83700)10/1/2010 5:25:59 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 89467
 
FRIDAY, OCT 1, 2010 06:02 ET
The U.S. searches for war criminals
BY GLENN GREENWALD
(updated below - Update II)

It doesn't happen often, but sometimes, something you read is so magnificent on its own that there is nothing to say about it. This USA Today article, proudly touting the increased efforts of the U.S. Government to track down and punish war criminals (provided, of course, that they're not American), is one such example:

War criminals find it's harder to hide from past, U.S. agents

When federal agents finally caught up with Gilberto Jordan, he had all the trappings of a solid American life: a house in a tidy South Florida neighborhood, steady work as a chef and a spotless record as a law-abiding citizen since emigrating from Guatemala in the early 1990s.

Nothing suggested he was hiding from a horrific past that the agents attributed to him when they knocked on his door that day in May. He still used the same name that appeared on a decade-old order for his arrest on murder charges in his native country. . . .

The prosecution of Jordan, 54, underscores a new push by federal law enforcement agencies to hunt down war criminals and human rights abusers who have found refuge in the United States.

The agents that tracked him are from a special center that Immigration and Customs created last year to bolster its work on such cases.

When Jordan pleaded guilty this summer to participating in the [1982] Dos Erres massacre, it marked the first conviction won by a new, 50-person Justice Department office set up to prosecute them.

The targets range from African despots and military officers from the former Yugoslavia to lesser-known figures, such as Jordan. It's unclear how many are out there, but officials at Justice's Human Rights and Special Prosecutions office say they're tracking multiple suspects. Armed with new investigative tools, more legal powers and a beefed-up congressional mandate, they're charging culprits at an unprecedented rate.

Convicted offenders usually are deported, sometimes after a U.S. prison stint. Many end up being turned over to authorities in countries where they face charges for war crimes or human rights abuses.

"I don't think there's any question that we're going to have a greater number of these cases and that these cases are going to reach (suspects from) more parts of the world," says Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, a child of Holocaust survivors who has pushed the more aggressive efforts to hold war criminals accountable. "It's something we have to do. We owe it to our citizens and we owe it to the world."

Congress passed the laws amid a broader international push after the Cold War to hold war criminals and human rights abusers accountable, says Eli Rosenbaum, who ran the Office of Special Investigations and now is director of strategy and policy in the new Human Rights and Special Prosecutions unit.

"Interest burgeoned all over the world in bringing these people to justice," Rosenbaum says. Among U.S. policymakers, "there was bipartisan support for doing this, and Congress gave us a lot of new tools."

Now, it's going full steam.

"We want to send a message to would-be human rights violators of the future," Rosenbaum says. "Their odds of getting away with it are shrinking rapidly."

I love that Lanny Breuer quote so much that I just need to repeat it: "It's something we have to do. We owe it to our citizens and we owe it to the world." And that Rosenbaum quote seems grounded in the premise that -- imagine this -- war crimes become more likely in the future, become virtually inevitable, if "would-be human rights violators" know they can "get away with it." This, from a country that actually placed as a Judge on its second-highest federal court level one of the prime legal architects of its worldwide torture regime, and which blithely leaves him there even as more evidence emerges of the central role he played in enabling it, and whose top political leader formally adopts a position of full immunity for its own war criminals. My duties as a citizen compel me to help this new, muscular DOJ War Crimes unit by pointing to one place where they haven't yet looked.



UPDATE: The website for this special DOJ unit searching for war criminals within the U.S. encourages people to notify them if the identity or whereabouts of any un-apprehended war criminals or human rights violators are known; I would hope that any of you with such information will discharge your solemn duties as citizens and call and/or email them (h/t netsharc):

How to Report a Human Rights Violator

The Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section actively seeks out information that may assist the U.S. Government in identifying human rights violators who may have entered the United States.

If you know of anyone in the United States or of any U.S. citizen anywhere in the world who may have been involved in perpetrating human rights violations abroad, please contact HRSP either by email at hrsptips@usdoj.gov or by postal mail at:

Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section (Tips), Criminal Division United States Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20530-0001

You do not have to identify yourself when providing information. Please provide as much detail as possible, such as:

* the suspect's name, place and date of birth,

* physical description, and current location;

* the suspect's alleged human rights violations including the locations and dates of those activities;

* how you learned of the suspect’s alleged activities and when and where you saw the suspect.

We are unable to reply to every submission; however, your information will be reviewed promptly by HRSP.

Information on non-U.S. citizen suspects living in the United States may be provided to Immigration and Customs Enforcement in the Department of Homeland Security, at 1-866-347-2423 (a toll-free call).

As the DOJ's Lanny Breuer said: "It's something we have to do. We owe it to our citizens and we owe it to the world."



UPDATE II: Speaking of un-apprehended war criminals, Blackwater has just received a huge, new contract from the State Department. Spencer Ackerman at Wired has the exclusive story. I wonder if that will help the administration's ostensible efforts to improve how the U.S. perceived in the Muslim world.



To: tejek who wrote (83700)10/1/2010 5:27:35 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 89467
 
Americans allowed themselves to be fooled by GW Bush and now they are doing it again
===
State Dept. tried to hide Blackwater’s piece of $10 billion contract: report

By Daniel Tencer
Friday, October 1st, 2010 -- 4:32 pm

Contract comes despite Sec. Clinton's pledge to ban 'private mercenary firms'

The State Department has awarded part of a $10-billion embassy protection contract to the company formerly known as Blackwater, but you wouldn't know it by looking at government documents.

On Thursday, the State Department announced the winners of a tender to protect security services to diplomatic missions around the world, including the US's massive embassy in Iraq. The name Xe Services -- Blackwater's current name -- doesn't appear in the contract, but the name International Development Solutions does.

Spencer Ackerman reports at Wired.com that International Development Solutions is a shell company set up by Blackwater in partnership with engineering firm Kaseman to run US Training Center, a Blackwater subsidiary.

"No one who looks at the official announcement of the contract award would have any idea that firm is connected to Blackwater," Ackerman writes.

Story continues below...


It's not clear how much of the $10-billion value of the contract will go to Blackwater. Nor is it clear whether Blackwater's share of the contract would require any work to be done in Iraq. That could be problematic, as the Iraqi government banned Blackwater from operating there earlier this year.

The method by which Blackwater acquired the State Department's "Worldwide Protective Services" contract, as it is known, appears to fall in line with the company's strategy to set up shell companies for the purpose of winning government contracts.

And it also comes despite past pledges by State Sec. Hillary Clinton to ban "private mercenary firms" from winning government contracts.

In early 2008, five months after Blackwater guards reportedly killed 17 civilians in Baghdad's Nisour Square, then-Sen. Clinton promised to end the practice of hiring private security companies.

"From this war's very beginning, this administration has permitted thousands of heavily-armed military contractors to march through Iraq without any law or court to rein them in or hold them accountable," Clinton said in a statement. "These private security contractors have been reckless and have compromised our mission in Iraq. The time to show these contractors the door is long past due."

That year Clinton also co-sponsored a bill with independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, the Stop Outsourcing Security Act, which would have required "government personnel" to be used for security services.

But little has come of that promise since Clinton took the reins at the State Department. In June, it was reported that Blackwater had won a $120-million contract from the State Department to provide security services in Afghanistan.

In his report, Ackerman notes that the bid process "included a 'review' to ensure that companies met 'minimum criteria' for eligibility," including a check to see if the company had been barred from being awarded government contracts.

"Despite Blackwater guards killing 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad’s Nisour Square in 2007; killing two Afghan civilians on a Kabul road in 2009; and absconding with hundreds of unauthorized guns from a US military weapons depot in Afghanistan using the name of a South Park character, federal contracting authorities have never suspended or debarred Blackwater," Ackerman writes.



To: tejek who wrote (83700)10/1/2010 5:39:25 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 89467
 
Talk about "won't get fooled again" ROFL!

Gates: US Military Not Ever Leaving Afghanistan
Defense Secretary's Comments the Ultimate Rejection of July 2011 Drawdown
by Jason Ditz, September 30, 2010
Email This | Print This | Share This | Antiwar Forum
Though the comments were made several months ago and only became public today, Defense Secretary Robert Gates had a moment of shocking honesty during a May dinner for Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

“We’re not leaving Afghanistan prematurely,” Gates insisted during comments at the dinner, “in fact, we’re not ever leaving at all.” The comments serve as a shocking contrast to his repeated comments over the summer, in which he insisted there was “no question” in his mind that the drawdown from Afghan would start in July 2011.

Gates continued with this public position even after President Obama disavowed the date, and at this point Gen. David Petraeus insists the war could easily last another decade, while NATO countries are disavowing a possible 2014 date to end the war.

Gates’ comments came in the context of his complaints about having “abandoned” Afghanistan after the Soviet occupation ended. With the US now firmly on the side of the former Soviet allies, it seems Gates’ answer is to continue the occupation forever.



To: tejek who wrote (83700)10/1/2010 7:40:24 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
I hope they allowed themselves to be fooled and aren't just stupid.