SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (66720)10/1/2010 6:57:54 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219741
 
That statement if yours is beyond perverse

What's perverse is buying a shiny yellow metal that consumes valuable energy resources, and scars the land, merely so people can make jewelry out of it, or call a "collectible coin".

I would rather own the comparable value in Natural Gas, Oil, or Uranium.

If we're going to tear up the environment, I would rather it be for the purpose of obtaining a substance that we actually consume, not just store away behind lock and key.

I guess it's all just a matter of perspective. But I believe my opinion is just as valid as that of the goldbug crowd.

Hawk



To: maceng2 who wrote (66720)10/2/2010 1:16:54 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 219741
 
china exports 30-40k oz of monetary gold per annum in the form of pandas bullion

i know the leader of the single largest retail buying group of such panda here in freedom hk

i am told that panda gold shall become scarce

bullish


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News