SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Madharry who wrote (39528)10/3/2010 12:34:35 PM
From: Paul Senior2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78628
 
OT: Masters of the Universe should be held to different standards from the general population?

Perhaps sleazy non-sexual affairs, providing subordinates with phony expense numbers or directing subordinates to falsify reports ---all piddling things like this should have no consequences for the Masters. Of course, for anyone else not a Master, this cannot apply. After all we don't want everyone in our companies now going out to purposely lie egregiously on THEIR expense reports assuming if they get caught, at worst they'll only have to pay back the $ amount in question.

The USA doesn't have a king or queen or official royalty class. Instead, for many people, it's celebrities who are our substitute royalty. We read about them, follow them around, and are in awe of them when we're in their presence. So these celebs too, in their way, are Masters of the Universe. And thus perhaps they also should not be held accountable for their actions as might plain folk. Lindsy Lohan, Paris Hilton -- celebs and wealth creators that they are (They keep many people employed), they should never be arrested or thrown in the slammer just because they broke a few laws that the common folk are subject to. :>)



To: Madharry who wrote (39528)10/3/2010 2:29:06 PM
From: Spekulatius3 Recommendations  Respond to of 78628
 
>>Would you fire a guy who made billions for you because he fudged 20 grand on his expense report? and then pay him $40 million in severance?<<

I would if the dealings of the CEO undermines the ethical fabric of the company and I think it applies in tis case. If the CEO, decides that it is right to fudge expense reports why can't everybody else. Why stop with expense reports - what about kickbacks for buyers or get some contracts to friends and family.