SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (38945)10/3/2010 10:49:31 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 103300
 
<<anything a disqualified candidate attempted to do as President is null and void, which is why it is important for the Supreme Court to decide this matter sooner than later.>> What is your legal authority for your statement that the actions of a disqualified President are null and void? The law is just the opposite. The actions of a defacto officer as opposed to a de jure officer are valid.



To: longnshort who wrote (38945)10/3/2010 10:53:39 AM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
I would like to read that part of the constitution. Can you link it?