Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (280922)	10/5/2010 10:06:57 AM
From: Les H	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 306849

Charles Schwab has written an eloquent plea in the Wall Street Journal calling for the end of the Fed's zero-interest rate policy. We second that plea. The Fed's zero-interest-rate policy, now going into its fourth year, is hosing people who are responsible and live within their means to bail out people and companies who don't (or didn't). Anyone who has saved money is being screwed by this policy. Anyone who borrows money is being rewarded. The Fed's zero-interest-rate policy is also still giving a gigantic subsidy to banks by allowing them to borrow money from the government for nothing and then lend it back to the government at a ~3% interest rate. The spread on this trade continues to produce massive Wall Street profits, and, with them, enormous bonuses--without any of the risk that is normally supposed to accompany such profitability. Once again, this policy rewards those who helped cause the crisis in the first place, at the expense of those who didn't. (If you don't understand how great it is to be a banker right now, read "How To Make The World's Easiest $1 Billion"). Why does the Fed have a "zero-interest rate" policy? To stimulate borrowing. If money is free, the theory goes, people and companies will borrow a boatload of it--and they'll use it to buy stuff, make investments, and create jobs. In a garden-variety cyclical recession, this policy works. But this time it's not working. Why not? Because this isn't a garden-variety recession. This is a recession caused by too much debt. (A balance-sheet recession, as the economists say). You can't borrow your way out of a debt problem. You have to get out of it by doing what American consumers are now doing despite the Fed's attempts to stimulate more borrowing: by spending less, saving more, and paying down (or restructuring) your debts. American consumers are cutting back because they, if not the government, have realized that they have too much debt--and they're taking steps to reduce it. They're starting to save again--5%+ of disposable income and climbing--instead of spending every penny they earned. With consumers tightening their belts and the country awash in excess capacity, companies aren't borrowing money to make new investments. They're simply borrowing money to replace older, higher-priced debt--and, in the process, earning more profits for their shareholders (as a result of the artificially low interest rates). This is another gift from taxpayers to borrowers, and it comes at the expense of companies and people with money in the bank. How much is the Fed's zero-interest rate policy costing savers? As Charles Schwab notes, there is more than $7.5 trillion sitting in FDIC-insured savings accounts alone (this doesn't include the trillions more money-market accounts and other short-term savings vehicles). At a normal 3% rate of interest, this money would be earning savers $225 billion a year. Under the current zero-interest-rate policy, meanwhile, it's earning them nothing. Not once since the start of this recession has the Fed acknowledged the real problem with the economy--that we borrowed way too much money and bought stuff we couldn't afford. It's time for the Fed to acknowledge that. It's also time for the Fed to reward behavior that will eventually get us out of the malaise: Debt reduction, savings, and a return to financial discipline. Lastly, it's time for the Fed to stop rewarding banks to doing nothing more than borrowing money for free from the government and lending it back to the government--and instead force them to earn their money the old-fashioned way, by making smart private-sector loans. How can the Fed do this? By simply raising short-term interest rates to a normal level, say 2%-3%. Not suddenly, not overnight--over the period of, say, a year. And not to a restrictive level. Just back to normal. Just back to where rates would be if the Fed weren't doing everything in its power to get the country to borrow its way out of a debt problem. onenewspage.com I think this is the second or third time that Charles Schwab has made this plea. See also related articles: Cheap Debt for Corporations Fails to Spur Economy By GRAHAM BOWLEY, New York Times October 3, 2010 nytimes.com