SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chuckie who wrote (39851)11/10/1997 4:06:00 PM
From: Barry Grossman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Has this been posted?

news.com

Intel touts low-cost chip strategy
By Michael Kanellos
November 7, 1997, 6:30 p.m. PT

Intel fleshed out more details of plans disclosed earlier
to fit chips into as many boxes and markets as
possible, including Pentium II processors aimed at
sub-$1,000 personal computers.

Speaking to financial analysts at the company's
biannual analyst's meeting, top Intel executives,
including CEO Andy Grove and COO Craig Barrett,
said that Intel would next year release a series of
processors each optimized for a different class of
computing device.

See previous NEWS.COM article, Low-end PCs
interest Intel.

For instance, the Santa Clara, California, company will
make Pentium-class chips for "dumb" terminal
devices--stripped down devices with no hard
drive--which will cost $500. The company will also
release Pentium II processors for sub-$1,000 PCs.

Pentium IIs for high-end server computers that can be
bundled into powerful eight-processor systems and sell
for several thousand dollars will also appear.

Under this strategy, the venerable Pentium chip will
find its way into low-end terminal devices supporting a
variety of operating systems, Intel said, including Java,
Unix, and Windows NT, Dataquest semiconductor
analyst Nathan Brookwood reported.

Design features for terminal computer processors may
come from Intel's "embedded" chip group, the reverse
of Intel's usual practice.

The Pentium II processor will appear in myriad forms
in a wide variety of computers, but the basic internal
chip architecture won't vary, said Brookwood.
Instead, Intel will vary the size of both the on-board
memory, called "cache," and the packaging of the
Pentium II. Intel will also modify the chip set, the
group of companion chips which work with the
processor.

For server computers, the new versions of the
Pentium II will have two megabytes of cache. This
memory will communicate with the processor at the
same speed that the processor runs internally.

Currently, Pentium II cache memory talks to the
processor at half speed and tops out at one megabyte.
Generally, the more cache and the faster the cache, the
better overall system performance is.

On the low end, Intel will market a cacheless Pentium
II for sub-$1,000 computers.

Architectural nuances will exist between consumer
machines optimized for the home and machines made
for the second time buyer. Certain chip sets, Intel said,
will incorporate graphics and audio features and be
coupled accordingly.

Pentium II processor speeds will also run up to 450
MHz, said Intel officials, who have discussed many of
these details before. Grove, in fact, has referred to the
process of selling the same core technology into
different markets as "multiple bifurcation." Today's
event cemented most of the details.

Intel will also follow through with plans to develop a
"cartridge" for slim notebooks, similar in function but
different in size than the current mobile module.

Although the strategy means that Intel will be making
processor for lower-priced computers and devices
than in the past, the company plans to make up the
difference by selling more processors into the server
and the workstation space.

"In order to maintain that $200 ASP [average selling
price], they are going to be selling more processors for
servers," he said. Brookwood indicated it would not be
surprising to see high-end Pentium IIs for servers
selling for $2,000 to $4,000 in 1998.

While Intel discussed incorporating more graphics and
audio functionality into its chip sets, the company
specifically stated it would not follow the "system on a
chip" strategy pioneered by Cyrix, in which graphics
and other functions are hardwired to the main
processor.

Intel said it doesn't like the strategy because processor
advancements happen at a different pace than
advancements in graphics, which in turn forces all
segments to follow the lowest common denominator.

"They specifically went out of their way to say they
would not do system on a chip," said Brookwood.

=====================
Barry