Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (66894)	10/6/2010 3:52:01 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Respond to of 217879

BS, China has been way below their potential GDP per capita which would be expected [though it wasn't part of the data] by Smart Fraction Theory. That's because they were stuck for half a century in Mao's maelstrom and collectivist totalitarian muck. What assumption? <The assumption is a static China?> Did you assume that? And yes, you would be wise to not be so silly: <. It is terribly silly to assume that Chinese in China are not evolving in a new environment..> One of the big new evolutionary pressures in China is the huge surplus of males [which TJ originally denied but he seems to have come around to believing it now] due to selective abortions. Females will have their options improved for their enthusiastic eugenics programme in which they choose males to be rejected as unsuitable for human breeding programmes. Mqurice PS: Sorry about your sore ribs. Try giggling instead of laughing.