SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 10:51:25 AM
From: jmhollen4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
He was born in Kenya, Bozo.......... And then his papers were phonied up in Hawaii, ignoring the rule that one of parents need to be a US citizen and meet the USA residency time requirements which his mother never did.

Vital Statistics clerks were for sale cheap back in the day, and everyone knows the Soros-Daly Oboobo-machine is very well funded.

The jerk won't come clean with the original paperwork, nor will he produce verifiable records on his education, etc. If Bush or Palin tried that crap, your Demoncrap and Libbo Media arseholes would fry them in used muslim tortilla oil.

.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 10:51:39 AM
From: jmhollen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224755
 
The Fix: GOP hammers away at Joe Manchin
Washington Post - Chris Cillizza - ?1 hour ago?
1. The National Republican Senatorial Committee is ramping up its commitment in the West Virginia Senate race with new radio and newspaper ads running today.

.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 10:53:18 AM
From: jmhollen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224755
 
Anger About the Economy Fuels Republican Advantage
ABC News - Gary Langer - ?3 hours ago?
That's part of the takeaway from the latest ABC News/Yahoo! News poll. Its results identify why the public's economic discontent is playing so strongly in the Republican Party's favor in the upcoming midterm elections: in ...

.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 11:08:12 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
Markets pricing in split Congress, gains under GOP 10/12 10:00 AM



By Ryan Vlastelica
NEW YORK, Oct 8 (Reuters) - This November, the bulls are looking for elephants.
The Republican Party, with an elephant as its symbol, could take control of at least the U.S. House of Representatives in the Nov. 2 mid-term elections, increasing the prospect of legislative gridlock and pushing stock prices higher.
"We're going to have gridlock relative to what we have now, and for markets, it's best to have paper-thin margins between the parties," said Ken Fisher, chief executive of Woodside, California-based Fisher Investments, which manages about $33 billion.
According to a Reuters poll, a majority of analysts expect a Republican takeover of at least one chamber will result in near-term equity gains. For details, see [ID:N11142851]
"The S&P 500 has already put in about 20 to 30 points as a results of the polls shifting in favor of the Republicans, and if they don't get those gains those points will be taken out," said Jeffrey Friedman, senior market strategist at Lind-Waldock in Chicago. The S&P now trades around 1,167.
"I see upside of maybe 5 to 6 percent if the Republicans take both houses, depending where we are on Nov. 1, but if Democrats win, we could see downside of 50 points."
In midterm election years dating to 1962, the S&P 500 has on average risen 2.35 percent in the two months prior to the election but gained 7.46 percent in the three months following, according to investment firm Birinyi Associates of Westport, Connecticut. [ID:nN16276354]
TAXES AND ENERGY
The primary area of concern to investors is taxes; it is unclear whether tax cuts, and certain tax reductions on dividends, enacted during the Bush years will remain intact.
"If we revert back to the old tax rules, the market will have a substantial selloff. We'll run the risk of a second recession," said Keith Wirtz, who helps oversee $24 billion as the chief investment officer at Fifth Third Bancorp in Cincinnati, Ohio.
The energy sector, which generally opposes plans like cap-and-trade legislation and drilling moratoriums, could be among the beneficiaries of a Republican-led Congress.
"The oil industry would probably do better with Republican gains because regulatory pressures are coming from the Democratic side," said Carl Birkelbach, chairman of Birkelbach Investment Securities in Chicago.
Birkelbach said alternative energy companies could suffer if Republicans win as they may de-emphasize government subsidies for the industry. Since the start of September, the S&P Energy index is up 14 percent, compared with gains of 11 percent for the broader index.
Linda Duessel, market strategist at Federated Investors in Pittsburgh, said: "Republicans won't be able to repeal healthcare because no one will have 60 votes, but it does seem likely that cap-and-trade would be considered dead if they won."
REPEAL, NO. REFORM, POSSIBLY.
Under Democratic control, the Obama Administration passed sweeping healthcare and financial regulatory overhaul. Those sectors both came under pressure in the run-up to bill passage, but the prospect of major change in the laws is unlikely.
"If Republicans capture the House as expected, people would expect a moderation of some of the regulatory provisions in healthcare and financial reform," said David Joy, chief market strategist at Boston-based Columbia Management, which has $341 billion in assets under management.
"If they (Republicans) don't have a good showing, you could see an adverse reaction in those two sectors."
The S&P financial sector fell 17 percent from a high in mid-April to when the bill was signed in July. It has trailed the broader market since Sept. 1, rising 8.1 percent to the S&P's 11 percent gain.
Given broad Republican opposition to stricter regulation of industry, strong electoral gains by the party could help the financial shares.
"They've been under the most pressure with the Obama administration, and in a more business-friendly Congress, they'd be the biggest winners," said Jaewoo Nakajima, associate managing director at ISI Group in New York. "Republicans may attempt to repeal parts of financial regulation or at least go easy with some of the reforms in the pipeline."
But because the Senate requires 60 votes to override a filibuster and a two-thirds majority of the 100-seat body to overturn a presidential veto, few argue that even sweeping Republican victories will result in massive changes to current law. (Additional reporting by Rodrigo Campos)


Get more news on:SYMBOLS: .SPXNEWS TYPE: Market Headlines, Top Stories: General, Top NewsSECTORS:



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 11:09:39 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
kennyboy tail between leggs hiding under backyard deck



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 11:25:53 AM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
So you are saying that Obama and his cronies are as lame as you claim "birthers" are! You are a hoot Kenneth!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 11:29:50 AM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224755
 
Most Voters Fear Health Care Law Will Cause Some Companies To Drop Employee Coverage
Tuesday, October 12, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Nearly three-out-of-four voters (73%) believe it is at least somewhat likely that the new health care law will cause some companies to drop health insurance coverage for their employees, including 47% who say it is Very Likely. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely U.S. Voters finds that just 19% think that’s unlikely.

While 84% of Mainstream voters it is at least somewhat likely that some companies will drop health insurance coverage for their employees, most Political Class voters (52%) say that is not likely to occur (see more on the Political Class-Mainstream divide).

To address the reality of some companies threatening to drop coverage, the Obama administration announced last week that 30 companies and organizations - including McDonalds and the union for New York City teachers - have been granted one-year waivers from certain requirements of the new national health care law.

But voters don’t think such waivers are the way to go. Only 21% believe it is better for the government to grant business exemptions to the health care law on a case-by-case basis. Sixty-four percent (64%) disagree and say the better course is for the law to be revised so that it can apply to all businesses. Fifteen percent (15%) are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Similarly, 64% think if a group of large companies receives an exemption from certain aspects of the health care law, all businesses should be given that same exemption. Only 19% disagree, with 18% more who are not sure.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 U.S. Likely Voters was conducted on October 10-11, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

How do voters feel in general about exemptions from the requirements of the new health care law? Become a Platinum Member and find out.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 11:30:49 AM
From: lorne4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
ken..."lorne, do you have "a shred of evidence" to show that Obama was not burn in the US?"...

You taking your cue from axelrod now? Thats the same thing axelrod said to a CBS talk show host after making accusations about funding to Repub. party without evidence....axelrod told show host to prove its not true.

Talk show host said to axelrod...is that the best you got.

hussein obama is supposed to be the President of all Americans and it is his duty to prove to all Americans that he is the legal President of The United States of America.

Can you tell me why hussein as his first official act as President was to seal all of his personal records????????????????? hide from the American people what they have a legal right to know.... answer that with a sensible answer kenny.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 12:04:45 PM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
ken..."lorne, do you have "a shred of evidence" to show that Obama was not burn in the US?"...

Here kenny...read the whole thing...the whole world has doubts about hussein's home country...well maybe hopeless dem cult members like yourself don't.

Sep 17, 2010 ... See this catalog of evidence

Obama's 'Certification of Live Birth' form reveals his Birth Registration was FILED in 1961 but was never fully ACCEPTED by the Hawaiian State Registrar's Office.
Hawaii is covering this up for political reasons to protect Obama. Only they know the ultimate reasons they are all willing to commit Misprision of Felony at this point in time given the mounting evidence that Obama was not physically born in Hawaii. Obama may have amended his record since 1961 to try to reinforce and cover up the original fraudulent filing. But his online COLB clearly shows that when it was FILED it was never finally ACCEPTED. This is a national disgrace that our entire system of laws including the Constitution and all legal records are being subverted and subordinated to cover up for Obama's continued fraud on the nation as to his true legal identity. What is so important about this one man that Hawaii is willing to see the nation destroyed by his corruption and lies from birth by his family and continued on all his life by Obama. The man is a grifter and conman. See this catalog of evidence that shows by the preponderance of the evidence that Hawaii and the nation are the victims of birth registration fraud by Obama's family in 1961:

english.pravda.ru

4. NO EVIDENCE OF A HAWAIIAN BIRTH FOR AKA OBAMA - WHAT ABOUT KENYA?

As for AKA Obama's birth in Kenya we hear this from attorney Mario Apuzzo "We have not heard from one international, federal, state, or local police or security agency that Obama's birth place has been officially confirmed.

0
An Investigator working for Philip Berg, Esq. learned the following which is contained in the investigator's affidavit dated October 30, 2008, that was filed with a Federal District Court in the case of Berg v. Obama, O8-cv-04083: Obama's step-grandmother, Sarah Obama, told Bishop McRae, who was in the United States, during a telephonic interview on October 12, 2008, while she was in her home located in Alego-Kogello, Kenya, that was full of security police and people and family who were celebrating then-Senator Obama's success story, that she witnessed Obama's birth in Kenya, not the United States (the English and Swahili conversation is recorded and available for listening). She was adamant about this fact not once but twice. The conversation which was placed on speaker phone was translated into English by "Kweli Shuhubia" and one of the grandmother's grandsons who were present with the grandmother in the house. After the grandmother made the same statement twice her grandson intervened, saying "No, No, No, He was born in the United States." During the interview, the grandmother never changed her reply that she was present when Obama was born in Kenya. The fact that later in the same interview she change her statement to say that Obama was born in Hawaii does not change the fact that she at first stated twice that she was present when Obama was born in Kenya. I cannot imagine a grandmother not knowing whether she was present or not at the birth of her American Senator and U.S. Presidential candidate grandson.

The investigator then personally went to the hospital in Mombassa, Kenya. He spoke with the Provincial Civil Registrar and he learned that there were records of Ann Dunham giving birth to "Barack Hussein Obama, III" in Mombassa, Kenya on August 4, 1961. The investigator then "spoke directly with an Official, the Principal Registrar, who openly confirmed the birthing records of Senator Barack H. Obama, Jr. and his mother were present, however, the file on Barack H. Obama, Jr. was classified and profiled. The Official explained Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. [sic] birth in Kenya is top secret. [H]e was further instructed to go to the Attorney General's Office and to the Minister in Charge of Immigration if [he] wanted further information."

It is alleged that the Kenyan government authorities have refused to cooperate and have thwarted all efforts by anyone to obtain any documents concerning Obama."

That is a real mind bender. Let's see; AKA Obama wasn't born in Kenya but his birth place is declared to be "top secret" by Kenyan officials. There are no records of AKA Obama being born in Kenya and those nonexistent records are being withheld and are "top secret". That sounds so much like what the official position of AKA Obama could be; "I have nothing to hide but I'm hiding it."

5. THE CRUX OF THE LEGAL STRAW THAT CAN BREAK AKA OBAMA'S BACK

Another piece of information that many fail to realize is that in the birth certificate cases, all that is needed is for the case to be heard. This case will be over in the "Discovery" phase. Before a trial starts, both sides are required by the court to put all their cards on the table to avoid "trial by ambush." The judge orders all evidence to be presented by both sides. Since this case is about discovering documents that are hidden, the case will be decided by court-ordered presentation of all relevant records. Lawyers in birth certificate cases don't need to win a trial; they only need to get a trial.

For those of you who think ridicule and name calling are effective debate tactics, I refer your kool-aid drenched, tin foil protected brains (a dose of your own medicine) to this article from American Thinker: Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate

6. ENOUGH ON THE HIDDEN BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND FORGED DOCUMENTS. WHAT IF AKA OBAMA WAS ACTUALLY BORN IN HAWAII?

What about the legal team that is keeping AKA OBAMA's college records hidden? Several people probably know what they are hiding. The best guess as to what is so secret isn't likely to be bad grades. More likely his admission papers will say he was a foreign student, or that he was receiving financial aid as a foreign student. How many people do you estimate already know what is on AKA OBAMA's college documents? Those records were handled routinely for more than 20 years. How many personnel in the registrar's offices of Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard University have seen AKA OBAMA's records and know what is in them? How many of those people would be willing to talk about it, or maybe even "leak" just one sheet of paper that would put even more cracks in AKA OBAMA's mirror? Is that number likely to be zero? Do you think that AKA OBAMA worries about how many people know something that could destroy his career? Fear of being "found out" is an obsession for NPD types. The Cost to hide Obama's past now 1.35 million.

7. THE CATELOG OF HIDDEN DOCUMENTS FROM AKA OBAMA'S PAST

So far we have only talked about the original birth certificate, supposedly locked up in Hawaii, and AKA OBAMA's draft and college records. Already the potential sources for leaks are numerous. And you can bet that AKA OBAMA and his lawyers are concerned about many more possible leaks than these.

0
SharePrint version Font Size Send to friendThere is a long list of vulnerability points for leaks, and there is a story behind every one of them. This list is one of many available and comes from one of my favorite blogs
• Original, vault copy birth certificate - Not released - Lawyers fees - greater than $1,000,000 - birth certificate - $15.
• Certification of Live Birth - Released - Counterfeit - Case and Affidavits
• Admitted British citizenship at birth - Confirmed via FactCheck.org/FightTheSmears.com
• Birth Announcement - Alleged to be a forgery
• Obama/Dunham marriage license - Not released
• Obama/Dunham divorce - Released (by independent investigators)
• Soetoro/Dunham marriage license - Not released
• Soetoro adoption records - Not released
• Fransiskus Assisi School School application - Released (by independent investigators)
• Punahou School records - Not released
• Soetoro/Dunham divorce - Released (by independent investigators)
• Selective Service Registration - Released - Counterfeit - Document Locator Number update - another FOIA request
• Occidental College records - Not released
• Passport - Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama's terrorism and intelligence adviser
• Columbia College records - Not released
• Columbia thesis - "Soviet Nuclear Disarmament" - Not released
• Harvard College records - Not released
• Harvard Law Review articles - None
• Illinois Bar Records - Not released.
• Baptism certificate - None
• Medical records - Not released
• Illinois State Senate records - None
• Illinois State Senate schedule - Lost
• Law practice client list - Not released
• University of Chicago scholarly articles - None
• Kindergarten records - this" lost or hidden" incident deserves more detail:
8. THE MISSING KINDERGARTEN RECORDS AND THE MYSTERIOUS NEWSPAPER BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENT
"Obama began his education in Hawaii's public schools. He was enrolled in Ms. Sakai's kindergarten class at Noelani Elementary School in 1967. He was only there a couple or three months before he was off to Indonesia.

Those who strive to legitimize AKA Obama have made much of the questionable "birth announcement" that may have been published in the Hawaiian newspapers. This "evidence" if so flimsy that refuting it may actually lend substance to the claim.

There are literally dozens of anti-Birther articles in the media that continue to claim that AKA Obama's birth announcement was in "two different newspapers". These two newspapers are printed by the same publisher and share the same stories and sources. The purpose of this "two newspaper" claim is to falsely imply that these newspapers are independent of each other, and therefore, unlikely to run the same birth announcement.

Birth announcements were called in or mailed in all the time. The Nordyke twins were announced, then recently (about a year ago) that announcement was replaced with the AKA Obama one. And the original owner of the "birth" residence died about 2 years, before the newly discovered birth announcement was touted by the Obama campaign after AKA Obama's Hawaiian 'birth" was challenged. There is also evidence of splicing in the microfilm. The most likely scenario is that the Nordyke twin's birth announcement was spliced out and replaced by a post-dated AKA Obama announcement. The fact that the home address in the fake AKA Obama announcement was never occupied by Ann Dunham and Barack Obama, and that the birth announcement just happened to appear right after the actual tenant of the home died, pretty much drives a stake though the heart of this story. Here is WND's story about the birth address.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 1:09:44 PM
From: chartseer4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
Barry's half sister was born in Indonesia and she has the same type of Hawaiian birth certificate as her half brother. It does show you do not have to be born in the US to have that particular hawaiian birth certificate. Now what was the reason her Hawaiian birth certificate was obtained for her?
More important what is the reason Barry has spent and is spending all that money concealing his records? I guess he isn't proud of his records. I would guess he is ashamed of his records. Who is this guy? Where does he come from? What is he hiding?
The more the stupid American public see of this guy the less they like.

comrade chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/12/2010 4:58:12 PM
From: MJ3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224755
 
Does Obama have a shred of evidence to show that he was "burn"(your word) in the United States of america.

We, the people of America, want to know---------this is a man who professed not to keep his State Senate records for Illinois.

What did Obama do with those State Senate records----burn them, throw them away, shred them?

Why is Obama refusing to release the records Americans have ask to see ?

Why is Obama playing this cat and mouse game with his records?

This is a game as much as his 'giving up cigarettes' was a game-----chewing nicorette which kept him on a nicotine high constantly or the other side of the coin withdrawing from nicotine and not being able to function without the nicotine.




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/13/2010 3:20:13 PM
From: chartseer1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224755
 
According to his paternal grandmother she was present at his birth in Kenya. Then again she has trouble remembering if she is a Christian or a muslim. I wonder if that memory thing is a family trait?

“At least two of his relatives in Kenya claim to have been present at his birth in Mombasa, Kenya. In addition, the Obama machine has scoffed at requests to see the form of the Hawaiian birth certificate that includes the specific hospital in which the delivery took place. The form released by the campaign does not include that information, leading to suspicions Obama might have been one of the foreign-born babies of the 1960s who were, nonetheless, provided birth certificates by the state of Hawaii.”

“Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence,” the document said. “The only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama’s original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him.”

comrade chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/14/2010 8:30:45 AM
From: chartseer2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
Aren't the statements of two eye witnesses who claim they were present at his birth in a hospital in kenya more than a shred of evidence?
Being his half sister who everyone knows was born in Indonesia has a similar Hawaiian birth certificate nullify his evidence?
His only shred of evidence!

comrade chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92750)10/14/2010 8:44:35 AM
From: chartseer3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
Only stupid people would support and elect a politician who has sealed all his records!
A chicago politician no less!

comrade chartseer