SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92771)10/12/2010 1:33:25 PM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 
Kenneth your argument regarding evidence of Obama's birth being somehow relative to Obama and his administration accusing people and institutions of criminal conspiracy to use foreign money in an election is about the most convoluted argument I have recently read from you.

Is it that you agree no evidence is necessary for the president and administration to sling accusations of corruption, of stealing from the people?

Perhaps you are saying Obama can say what he wishes to whomever he wishes because people somewhere have challenged his birth location or circumstances?

Just what are you trying to say?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92771)10/12/2010 1:50:54 PM
From: jlallen1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
lol

Such a silly reply....



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92771)10/12/2010 2:10:33 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 224750
 
Dollar Depreciation and the Higher Cost of Living
Companies:Advance Auto Parts Inc.AutoZone Inc.Family Dollar Stores Inc. Related Quotes
Symbol Price Change
AAP 59.51 +0.24

AZO 233.00 +0.17

FDO 46.10 -0.04

KMX 29.24 -0.44

KR 21.51 -0.08


{"s" : "aap,azo,fdo,kmx,kr","k" : "a00,a50,b00,b60,c10,g00,h00,l10,p20,t10,v00","o" : "","j" : ""} Josh Lipton, On Tuesday October 12, 2010, 11:30 am EDT

Stock investors are breathing easier with the expectation that the Federal Reserve will prop up our fragile economy with more help but, as consumers, they might be less enthusiastic about what dollar depreciation means for the cost of living.

Fed Head Ben Bernanke and his allies at the FOMC appear intent on voting for another bond purchase program at the November 2-3 FOMC meeting, a maneuver known as "quantitative easing" (QE). The point of the program is to keep long term interest rates low, encouraging borrowing and spending by companies and consumers.

How much will the FOMC purchase? In his speech on October 1, Federal Reserve Bank of New York President Bill Dudley said, "…some simple calculations based on recent experience suggest that $500 billion of purchases would provide about as much stimulus as a reduction in the federal funds rate of between half a point and three quarters of a point." (Hat tip: Yardeni Research)

But the potential impact of QE2 on the economy remains debatable. John Mauldin, president of Millennium Wave Advisors, looked at how much of an effect $2 trillion in QE could give us. His answer: not much.

See also, "Dollar Up, Gold Down?"

The investment pro, citing research from former Fed governor Larry Meyer, reported that a $2 trillion asset purchase program would: 1) lower Treasury yields by 50bp; 2) increase GDP growth by 0.3pp in 2011 and 0.4pp in 2012; and 3) lower the unemployment rate by 0.3pp by the end of 2011 and 0.5pp by the end of 2012.

"That is not much bang for the buck, so to speak, but it would be pointing a gun with a very big bang at the valuation of the dollar," says Mauldin.

Indeed, the prospect of more money printing has pressured the greenback, with the PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP), which tracks the value of the buck, down 6% in just the past four weeks.

In turn, dollar-denominated commodities have surged. Since August 27, when Bernanke first suggested that the Fed might consider another round of QE at his Jackson Hole speech, the price of gold has jumped 9%; the price of copper is up 12%; the price of crude oil has increased by $7.49; and soft commodities like wheat, cotton and corn have all shot higher.

Strategists like Gluskin Sheff's David Rosenberg have questioned what this currency debasement will now mean for your friends and neighbors. Rosenberg recently argued that, with oil back over $80 per barrel and US gasoline prices at the pump heading back above $3 per gallon, we will come to think of this dollar depreciation as a source of restraint for the consumer.

See also, "Hard to Hate the Dollar."

Put another way: For each penny increase in the cost of gas, US consumers pay an extra billion dollars a year, according to Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

The higher cost of oil, gas, and food acts as another tax, says Michael Pento of Euro Pacific Capital, at a time when consumers already feel pressured by a lousy labor market and languishing home prices. Of course, says the economist, the pressure of rising prices isn't applied evenly: those sitting lower on the socioeconomic ladder feel the brunt of the pain.

"If you are a person of means, you probably own a lot of foreign equities and precious metals," Pento says. "If you own the right stuff then you're probably doing Ok. But, if we're talking about people on the lower part of the socioeconomic scale, they're getting crushed."

As for investment implications, this added pressure on the consumer is one reason Pento says he sidesteps retailers. "The cost of consumer staples is going up and income is flat," says Pento. "So consumers have less money for discretionary spending. I don't want exposure to retailers in this environment."

The SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT), which includes holdings like Family Dollar (FDO), Advance Auto Parts (AAP), AutoZone (AZO), CarMax (KMX), and Kroger (KR), is up 22% year-to-date.

Peter Boockvar, equity strategist at Miller Tabak, emphasizes that investors should protect their portfolios with a strategy benefiting from a weaker buck: exposure to commodities, commodity-producing nations and U.S. companies generating much of their revenues overseas.

"With the path the Fed has taken," Boockvar says, "US investors must play self defense."

Nothing contained in this article is intended as a solicitation for business of any kind or for investment in the firm.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92771)10/12/2010 2:56:43 PM
From: lorne3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
ken..."Just what I thought. Lots of rhetoric, no evidence!"....

Ahh, come on ken, everyone here is well aware you have a serious problem with your thought process so I wont get into that part of your post.

So now ken...think for just a moment if you can. All of hussein's history has been blocked by presidential decree/order so any evidence to what he really is can not be accessed....do you understand that?

Now why do you suppose he did that? could it be so that no one CAN find any evidence of where he came from?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92771)10/12/2010 4:08:28 PM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 
Chamber Of Commerce Responds To Attacks By White House, Dems
October 12, 2010
realclearpolitics.com

Bruce Josten, the Executive VP of Government Affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, appears on FOX News to respond to claims by the White House and Democrats that the group is using foreign money to run ads against their party.

Josten says the Chamber does not solicit any foreign groups for funding of their "issue advocacy" ads. Josten says the group does not run ads for or against candidates, but rather uses money to promote issues important to them.

Josten categorically denies any foreign involvement to fund ads. "Absolutely none," he tells FOX News.

"I have never seen anything that rises to the level of this with any administration and I think it speaks of really grasping of straws at this late in the [campaign] cycle to try to convert something into a pariah for the public that just isn't going to hold water," Josten says of the recent attacks on his organization.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92771)10/12/2010 4:20:05 PM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
..."The Muslim Brotherhood "must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions." -- "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America," by Mohamed Akram, May 19, 1991.

What does that have to do with Congressman Ellison? Everything. The Muslim American Society paid for his Hajj. And what is the Muslim American Society? The Muslim Brotherhood.
"....

Message 26878290



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92771)10/13/2010 9:59:51 AM
From: JakeStraw5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
Believe it or not, with jobs falling for four consecutive months and unemployment stubbornly high near 10%, President Obama is out on the campaign trail bashing businesses and promoting class warfare. Huh? Oh my gosh is he off message.

He's slamming the Chamber of Commerce for allegedly using foreign money in campaign ads, even though there's not one shred of evidence of this. Huh (again)? Is the Chamber really a big election-year issue? Is it causing high unemployment?

But what's truly incredible about Obama's pre-election performance is how it totally misses the mark on the issues that really matter, like high unemployment, low growth, big-government spending, ObamaCare and tax hikes. That's the stuff people are really talking about.

It's as though Obama is from another planet, completely disconnected from the political reality as we march toward Nov. 2.
investors.com