Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TH who wrote (283019)	10/13/2010 11:34:57 AM
From: deeno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

"I read it. Too bad no one is listening. That guy is employed by BofA? Not for long. I think his next assignment will be a job hunt." Nope left about 18 months ago to go solo. Perma bear. Made great calls, got hot, cashed out. Hasnt been right since. will be someday though.

To: TH who wrote (283019)	10/13/2010 11:36:27 AM
From: Perspective	Respond to of 306849

Outstanding post. Just wish I knew wtf to do. I really dont want to stand by idly as these idiots destroy what's left of our country.

To: TH who wrote (283019)	10/13/2010 11:43:24 AM
From: Giordano Bruno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

Cover if you want :) marketwatch.com

To: TH who wrote (283019)	10/13/2010 12:21:58 PM
From: neolib	Respond to of 306849

I find it interesting that nowhere in the press has anyone commented on the paradox that the FED/most economists have long supported free trade due to an ideological bent towards less intervention in markets, which is directly responsible for the FED/most economists now pushing huge intervention in markets to try and meet the FED mandate of "full" employment. If you want low intervention in markets, but near "full" employment, then it pays to stay awake to things like trade imbalances before your production has been gutted, not afterwards when everything in WalMart is from China already. Otherwise the level of intervention is likely worse than it would have been.