Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : APMP (formerly APM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rudy who wrote (8406)	11/10/1997 6:48:00 PM
From: AlienTech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13456

I should have picked APM as a great short... But thought someone else had already picked it! Darn! techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com this guys nuts techstocks.com

To: Rudy who wrote (8406)	11/10/1997 6:52:00 PM
From: tom pope	Respond to of 13456

>>Funny thing is, people are totally obedient when rules are dictated by a computer. They do not even question computer's authority. When it comes to human authority or enforcer, a chaos is almost always inevitable.<< rudy, i thought you were a computer.

To: Rudy who wrote (8406)	11/10/1997 7:11:00 PM
From: Brian Lempel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13456

Rudy, can I enter the contest a day late long DBCC? I missed today's run, but I think there's more to come. Technically looks great. I'd really appreciate your technical opinion on QCOM. Does it point to good earnings tomorrow? I'm anticipating a poor opening with US markets deteriorating, which will serve as a good entry point. What do you think? Thanks in advance, Brian

To: Rudy who wrote (8406)	11/10/1997 10:07:00 PM
From: kormac	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13456

Rudy, I assure you that I am very satisfied with your rule making. I have no money on line here, and I have read from investment guides that a smart investor sould put his ego aside. One can't get mad at the stocks, nor can one love them. This has been a great education for me. It only cost me $6000, less than two quarters tuition at a first rate university. Here is a question for you. Apparently the technicals gave a warning that there was trouble with APM when it dropped to $30. The only way I can see that technical analysis can predict the drop in APM's stock (which has been caused by SEG, Fujitsu and now IBM) is that mutual fund managers understood the development of the technology much better than we did on the thread and this became reflected in the technicals. After all, in today's market, most stocks are owned by funds. I would like to have a small post mortem. Anybody have any ideas on this? Best regards, Seppo