Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (9235)	10/13/2010 5:19:55 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

OK greg you have once again exhausted any benefit of doubt. No one does or should take you serious in a discussion on SI and you've just provided another example of why that is. ----------- 1) Regarding birds: I have repeatedly and with a fair amount of explanation emphasized how consideration of context makes each statement true while each statement contradicts the other when context is not clear. You have repeatedly ignored or parsed out pertinent aspects of that explanation. Your parsing responses and quibbling triffles over the issue are just junk, which I will no longer consider worthy of my time. ----------- 2) I have demonstrated the flaws in your author's essay. "Interesting that you are not squeamish about saying that he's wrong and in doing so are perpetrating the very thing you are objecting to." Incredible nonsense. A typical greg o rean misrepresentation of events and attacks on the messenger. I've no idea even what you are referring to about him being wrong, his logic is definitely biased and flawed on account of his letting his bias underly the truth essay. No personal attack, just a fact. ----------- 3) I have repeatedly presented his exact quote and represented it for what it is. "At least you bothered to accurately quote him this time rather than putting words into his mouth that are not there." --------------- 4) His transparent 'call' is for Christians to take his statement 'Jesus is God' and confront all other belief systems as false comes through loud and clear. You denying it simply proves once again why no one should ever take you serious. "The fact is, he is calling for reasoned dialog not attacking anyone. Disagreement about the truth of a matter is not synonymous with attacking a person. His point that you keep missing is that logically, mutually exclusive truth claims cannot both be true and we should not be "Chicken" to say so. "