Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (9250)	10/13/2010 9:35:44 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

If you want a reasoned discussion absent personal insults then you are going to have to ante up there bucko. Aside from the fact that we are all still waiting for an honest admission from you that God does not command ANY rape in the bible; It was very clear that you assigned moral equivalence between Lot getting drunk and what his daughters did by taking advantage of him. Lot was indeed blameless in this instance. "If they did not FORCE him to drink himself into a stupor--then how do you whitewash his part in this terrible incest and rape?" I don't, there was no crime in Lot getting drunk. The moral responsibility remains with the perpetrators which in this case is the daughters alone. If a girl got really drunk and passed out on her 18th birthday and her brothers took advantage of her sexually do you really blame the girl? You probably do, but I do not. The text makes it abundantly clear that Lot had no idea what was going on" "How was his mental condition the day before and the day after?" Unlike you I don't have the ability to read the minds of people who lived thousands of years ago. The text says he was unaware of what his daughters did. That's all the information we have. Notice again NO COMMAND TO RAPE was there? Waiting......