SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr.Gogo who wrote (39695)10/15/2010 11:56:46 PM
From: Madharry  Respond to of 78744
 
That was an interesting article thank you. I'm not sure that the dividend model presented is one that I was use as being reflected as likely price of an index 7 years from now. it makes an assumption that the dividend will grow from 2% to 3.7% over the next seven years and that there will be no buybacks. Who know is they will be valid assumptions. Im not an spy player but I think I can find pockets of undervalued situations that will do better than the earnings yield of spy 500.



To: Mr.Gogo who wrote (39695)10/16/2010 1:57:26 AM
From: Spekulatius1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78744
 
re Hussman. As Madharry pointed out, the estimated return in Husman's article is based on the assumption that the Dividend yield that is currently below the historical mean will return to the LT mean of 3.7% and that it will take 7 years to do so.

There are a few problems - the payout ratio (ratio of Dividends/earnings) is lower than it used to be decades ago. Also, competing bond yields are much lower as well. I would argue that the earnings yield (reverse PE) is much more important than dividend yield - either that or a lower payout ratio should result in earnings growth above the LT growth rate.

Small changes cause huge deviations in the expected return. Overall I agree that the market looks fairly valued and perhaps overvalued, but that I why we get together here to sniff out better values and obtain better returns. If anything, a possible strategy might be to hedge by shorting the market against the value investments of choice.



To: Mr.Gogo who wrote (39695)10/16/2010 5:24:45 AM
From: Madharry1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78744
 
One last comment: this funds performance isnt inspiring, its a testament to his pr that it has $7 billion under management. I think there should be law that if you cant do as well as a 10year bond return you should refund your management fees.

google.com