Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FJB who wrote (387249)	10/16/2010 10:30:19 AM
From: Bill	15 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793688

Seems to me the officer who ordered the video to be destroyed should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice.

To: FJB who wrote (387249)	10/16/2010 11:45:26 AM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Respond to of 793688

but was ordered by an officer to delete both videos later the same day. Aviles was not asked if he knew why the officer ordered the videos destroyed. My only logical thought was to prevent the video from being sold to the media to be broadcast on the news, or put on youtube. But the phone should have been confiscated, the video removed as evidence, and the then returned/replaced. I certainly don't see anything conspiratorial.. Just a VERY BAD command decision. But that officer needs to be identified and questioned. Hawk