Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (8927)	11/10/1997 8:30:00 PM
From: Apple12	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

To Board here is the reply from bill fleckenstein to my email at top and my subsequent reply back... You are entitled to your opinion.However my motives are to try to help people NOT to try to get them to dump shares to help me.That would not work even if I wanted it to.You won't be quite so nasty once a bear market takes your money My reply: Apple12 wrote: > You are correct about a bear market taking money, would be a bummer. > But, > my anger is > your portrayal of some companies without any merit for what they > really do. > The light bulb > company refering to CYMER is what got me, that is so far off. We are > all > entitled to our > opinions as you said, I agree completely. I just feel that speaking > about > the fundamental reasons > why you would suggest shorting, anyone can call names. The forums you > have > access to becouse > of your status should be coveted. > > I regret my initial reaction to your Barrons interview, I was kinda > hopin > you would say > something to inform us, not just say they make lightbulbs or christmas > > ornaments. Just so you'll know ,I was interviewed for an hour .The Q&A in the paper was about one quarter of what I said.ALOT was deleted including alot about CYMI.You will see their is more negative stuff to come out about them.I don't say this with any relish .Things happen wether I want them to or not.I can choose to do something about it or not.Everyone is long .I'm short because there is no competition looking for ideas.You can do what you want.Good luck.....

To: TideGlider who wrote (8927)	11/10/1997 8:40:00 PM
From: rlev	Respond to of 25960

Well guys ... Anyone who got into this stock in the last six months has lost money. I thought I was getting in near bottem @28, and then @22 so I bought alot ... now I don't have money to buy more unless I sell something ... If this stock goes below 18 I probably will. Although I might be a fool to do it (putting too many eggs in the CYMI basket). We all know if we can hold out we will be rewarded ... so stay in there. -- Rich P.S. Most of my tech stock have decided to go swimming ... I hate days like this.

To: TideGlider who wrote (8927)	11/10/1997 10:03:00 PM
From: John Bloxom	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

<<where are the other analysts?>> Bruce: In my chosen trade, some wags say of judges that they were well thought of, but poor and ineffective lawyers. I wonder if the same is not true of analysts. Highly regarded, but bad, investors?? In my experience, "Buy" translates into: "it's been going up" "Strong buy" = "it's been going way up" "Sell" = "it's been going down", [etc.] I guess it's enough to say that I've never been much impressed by analysts. Sheeze, even I can tell you what song last played on the radio. Hang in there. John