SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (284556)10/19/2010 11:11:42 AM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
Feds to Sheriff Babeu: assassin warning was not valid
...............................................................
Oct 15, 2010
kgun9.com

FLORENCE, Ariz. (KGUN9-TV) - Should Pinal County residents be concerned about the possibility of drug assassins invading the Vekol Valley? Yes, says Sheriff Paul Babeu. No, says the Department of Homeland Security.
Who's right?
The public disagreement is the latest strange twist in the ongoing battle over border security in Arizona.
The current spat started with a press release that the sheriff's office sent out early Friday morning. In the release, Babeu said that in May the Department of Homeland Security informed several law enforcement agencies that assassins could be on their way to Pinal County's Vekol Valley. According to the sheriff, DHS based its warning on intelligence from a "proven credible confidential source," who told them that a cartel had decided to ambush bandits stealing from cartel smugglers in Arizona.
According to the advisory, the source warned that members of the Guzman cartel, meeting in Rocky Point, Mexico, had formed a two-step plan to lure the bandits into an ambush. Step one called for sending fifteen armed operatives wearing bullet-proof vests into the Vekol Valley. Those operatives would go in on foot, taking four days to get into position.
Once those assassins were in place, according to Babeu, the plan called for cartel members in Rocky Point to send "groups of simulated backpackers carrying empty boxes covered with burlap" into the valley to draw out the bandits. "Once the bandits have been identified, the (operatives) will take out the bandits," the release said.
Because the advisory was deemed to be a sensitive law enforcement matter, Babeu's office sat on it. But Babeu said he decided to make the warning public after a news agency contacted him on Wednesday, saying it had confirmed the information in the DHS e-mail.
In an interview with KGUN9's Jessica Chapin on Friday, Babeu predicted that since he is now talking about the advisory, DHS would probably repudiate the memo. "These are the people who have put this out, and have said it," Babeu said. "Now watch. They'll probably back off from it."
Those words were prophetic. When later contacted by 9 On Your Side reporter Jessica Chapin, a DHS spokesman discredited that e-mail.
Matthew Chandler, a spokesman with DHS's Media Relations office in Washington, admitted to Chapin that DHS sent out the advisory in May. But in an e-mail to her, he wrote, "This particular information proved to be inaccurate. At this time, DHS does not have any specific, credible information on intra-cartel violence taking place in Arizona."
When Chapin relayed that response to Babeu's public information officer, Tim Gaffney, Gaffney was incensed. The fact that the Pinal County Sheriff's office had to hear about DHS's disavowal third hand, through KGUN9 News, clearly did not sit well with him.
In response, Gaffney fired off a challenge to Chandler by e-mail. It read in part, "Can you please explain to me how the Department of Homeland Security can say that the information was 'proved to be inaccurate?' The intelligence information disseminated by your office was correct regarding the Deputy Puroll shooting and four weeks later we had two illegal immigrants murdered in this same area described in the email where they said it would take place. One of the illegal immigrants was armed with an assault rifle."
Gaffney also pointed out to Chandler that over the past several weeks, officers have found several spotters, as also predicted in DHS's May advisory. As Friday evening, Gaffney still had not received a response.
The Vekol Valley is the same place where Pinal County Deputy Louie Puroll was wounded on April 30. Puroll reported that he had been following suspected drug smugglers when they spotted him and started shooting.
Some media critics attacked that story, quoting forensics experts as saying Puroll's account was unlikely. But a DPS gunshot residue test backed Puroll's version of events.
In the Friday press release, Babeu pointed out that the DHS memo also backed Puroll's story, and quoted this passage from it: "... we received information from a source who reported that the scouts in the valley (the Cartel has 23 scout locations with rolling encryption) were reporting that bandits had shot two sheriff's deputies and the area was covered by cops."
In his statement to the media Friday, Babeu made a plea to Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano to make good on her promise to secure Arizona's border "or give us the resources we need so we can protect our Arizona families."
Earlier this week, Babeu asked Pinal County supervisors to release money to his department to pay for increased staffing, to create a team to develop intelligence aimed at protecting residents from drug traffickers in the county. One of the sheriff's goals is to track down and remove drug spotters that now help smugglers keep a lookout for patrols. Law enforcement officials arrested one such spotter last month.
The sheriff's anti-smuggling presentation received a lukewarm response from some supervisors, who stressed that they have other budget priorities.
Babeu and some other border-area sheriffs have also been waging a months-long campaign to get the federal government to do more to secure the border.
In light of Sheriff Babeu's persistent attacks on the Obama administration over border security and illegal immigration issues, it's perhaps unsurprising that DHS has been slow to return the sheriff's calls. Earlier this year KGUN9 News documented a similar slow response by the Obama administration to Republican governor Jan Brewer's repeated calls for better border security.
In releasing releasing the DHS memo this morning, Sheriff Babeu said he was doing so "in an effort to inform the public about the dangers associated with drug cartels operating in Pinal County."
In his response to KGUN9 News, the DHS's Chandler did not deny the cartels pose a danger. But like Babeu, Chandler also used the opportunity to score some political points, writing, "Over the past twenty months, this Administration has dedicated unprecedented manpower, technology and infrastructure to the Southwest border. In addition to remaining in close contact with law enforcement on the ground, over the past several months, we have added personnel and assets to Arizona to assist other federal, state, and local partners to keep our communities safe."
But Babeu told KGUN9 News, the main response he's seen from the feds so far is to put up signs warning Americans that the area is dangerous. "How about instead of putting up signs, how about coming in and removing and addressing the threat?"



To: steve harris who wrote (284556)10/19/2010 11:30:30 AM
From: joseffyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Significant

breitbart.com



To: steve harris who wrote (284556)10/19/2010 11:45:34 AM
From: joseffyRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 306849
 
With Bill Ayers in charge of the US military
..............................................................

Troops chafe at restrictive rules of engagement, talks with Taliban

By SARA A. CARTER National Security Correspondent October 19, 2010
washingtonexaminer.com

KANDAHAR, AFGHANISTAN -- To the U.S. Army soldiers and Marines serving here, some things seem so obviously true that they are beyond debate. Among those perceived truths: The restrictive rules of engagement that they have to fight under have made serving in combat far more dangerous for them, while allowing the Taliban to return to a position of strength.
"If they use rockets to hit the [forward operating base] we can't shoot back because they were within 500 meters of the village. If they shoot at us and drop their weapon in the process we can't shoot back," said Spc. Charles Brooks, 26, a U.S. Army medic with 1st Battalion, 4th Infantry Regiment, in Zabul province.
Word had come down the morning Brooks spoke to this reporter that watch towers surrounding the base were going to be dismantled because Afghan village elders, some sympathetic to the Taliban, complained they were invading their village privacy. "We have to take down our towers because it offends them and now the Taliban can set up mortars and we can't see them," Brooks added, with disgust.
In June, Gen. David Petraeus, who took command here after the self-inflicted demise of Gen. Stanley McChrystal, told Congress that he was weighing a major change with rules for engaging enemy fighters in Afghanistan. That has not yet happened, troops say. Soldiers and Marines continue to be held back by what they believe to be strict rules imposed by the government of President Hamid Karzai designed with one objective: limit Afghan civilian casualties.
"I don't think the military leaders, president or anybody really cares about what we're going through," said Spc. Matthew "Silver" Fuhrken, 25, from Watertown, N.Y. "I'm sick of people trying to cover up what's really going on over here. They won't let us do our job. I don't care if they try to kick me out for what I'm saying -- war is war and this is no war. I don't know what this is."
To the soldiers and Marines risking their lives in Afghanistan, restrictions on their ability to aggressively attack the Taliban have led to another enormous frustration stalking morale: the fear that the Karzai government, with the prodding of the administration of President Obama, will negotiate a peace with the Taliban that wastes all the sacrifices by the U.S. here. Those fears intensified when news reached the enlisted ranks that the Karzai government, with the backing of senior Obama officials, was entering a new round of negotiations with the Taliban.
"If we walk away, cut a deal with the Taliban, desert the people who needed us most, then this war was pointless," said Pvt. Jeffrey Ward, with 1st Battalion, 4th Infantry Regiment, who is stationed at Forward Operating Base Bullard in southern Afghanistan.
"Everyone dies for their own reasons but it's sad to think that our friends, the troops, have given their lives for something we're not going to see through."
Other soldiers agreed. They said they feared few officials in the Pentagon understand the reality on the ground.
From the front lines, the U.S. backing of the Karzai government, widely seen as riddled with corruption by the Afghans living in local villages, has given the Taliban a position of power in villages while undercutting U.S. moral authority.
Corrupt government officials have made "it impossible for us to trust anyone," said elder Sha Barar, from the village of Sha Joy. The people of that village and many others profess fear of the Taliban, and recount tales of brutality and wanton killings by the Taliban and their sympathizers. But they don't see the Karzai government as a positive force in their lives.
Karzai said that talks need to continue with the Taliban "at a fixed address and with a more open agenda to tell us how to bring peace to Afghanistan and Pakistan."
But U.S. troops and Marines interviewed during the past month in Afghanistan question what negotiations would really mean, to both them and the Afghan people. And they almost universally believe that negotiating would be a mistake before achieving decisive gains they believe are attainable once oppressive rules of engagement are relaxed.
"What does it mean if we give in to the Taliban? They are the enemy," Brooks said. "This place is going to be a safe haven for terrorists again. The government doesn't care about the sacrifices already made. As far as the mission goes, I want to see these kids go to school and have a future but not at the expense of my friends -- not anymore."
Sara A. Carter is The Washington Examiner's national security correspondent. She can be reached at scarter@washingtonexaminer.com.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com