Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (590608)	10/19/2010 3:08:31 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571565

RE:"Down with the rich!" Again. Your definition of the rich is?

To: tejek who wrote (590608)	10/19/2010 3:19:40 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571565

Ted, > Do you think all private companies are booming success stories? No, but that's the point. The weaker companies have to be allowed to fail so that the successful ones can grow and thrive. I guess you identify with the weaker companies, given that you yourself couldn't cut it in the private sector. > Could that be because the population of the state keeps growing, Ten? CA's policies have forced tax-paying middle class citizens to move out. They are being replaced by lower income immigrants. That's why the population keeps growing but the tax base keeps shrinking. They're your left-wing policies, which ironically has helped to widen the gap between rich and poor. How sad that in a state as great as this, with its fertile farms, diverse culture, and innovative high-tech, that it is declining because of liberalism? Of course your answer will always be the same brain-dead excuse. "Prop 13!" Just like every other excuse you come up with whenever you want to run away from the obvious. Tenchusatsu