SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (285040)10/20/2010 12:28:24 PM
From: The ReaperRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
This is good gov't at work.

Wall Street Bailout Returns 8.2% Profit Beating Treasury Bonds

So I guess Bush did the right thing?



To: tejek who wrote (285040)10/20/2010 12:46:56 PM
From: Broken_ClockRespond to of 306849
 
How did you "bold" attempt miss this part?

One of those subsidies is the $350 billion that savers forgo each year because the Fed keeps interest rates near zero, according to Petzel’s calculations. While banks can borrow at close to zero from the Fed, they lend to consumers and corporations at almost 5 percent, or to the Treasury at 2.5 percent, and they get to keep the difference.

“The huge wealth transfer from fixed-income pensioners to the banks has helped the banks repay TARP,” Petzel said.

The government and the Fed took on more risk than just TARP during the crisis, which isn’t reflected in the program’s cost, said Nomi Prins, a former Goldman Sachs managing director and author of the 2009 book, “It Takes a Pillage: Behind the Bailouts, Bonuses, and Backroom Deals from Washington to Wall Street.”

According to Prins’s tally, the money plowed into the financial system to prop it up peaked at $19.4 trillion. Banks have benefited from that cash, which helped keep prices of mortgage securities, house prices and other assets overvalued, Prins said in an interview. Even though some of the support has been withdrawn, part of it will likely be lost, such as the hundreds of billions of dollars put into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, she said.



To: tejek who wrote (285040)10/20/2010 1:12:03 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
They're about -70% vs gold. It all looks good if you artificially wreck the currency to make the payments.



To: tejek who wrote (285040)10/20/2010 1:27:28 PM
From: ggershRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Hey what I want to know is where are our BONUSES!