SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: uu who wrote (5426)11/10/1997 11:40:00 PM
From: bob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Addi and All,

This article was a *MMM*. (Microsoft Media Manipulation).

JMHO

Bob



To: uu who wrote (5426)11/11/1997 5:31:00 PM
From: Andy M.  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 64865
 
Addi,

A lot of people are attacking that JAVA survey in general terms as "nonsense" or MSFT FUD, but I'm wondering what the responses are to the various claims the developers in the survey make, namely:

1. need to test on multiple platforms
2. incompatibilities between JDK 1.02 and JDK 1.1, different virtual machines, different tool kits.
3. lack of open standards
4. poor performance
5. "It costs more to write Java applications" [according to one developer]

In other words, I wonder if the thread can have a substantive discussion of the merit, or lack of merit, of the claims made in the survey. Are these serious problems or are they not? Can Sun overcome them? I know the thread has touched on these issues at various times before, and I've read those discussions, yet I wasn't prepared for the overwhelming negativity of this survey and wonder if a concentrated and fresh airing of these issues is possible.

Thanks.

Andy