To: Canuck Dave who wrote (193350 ) 10/23/2010 10:38:18 PM From: marcos Respond to of 313487 cfo.v - missed most of the run on that, due to a personal cash crunch last winter, had to sell most everything non-sheltered, it was painful ... probably would not have sold anything like the top anyway, lol, so good on ya mate eas.v - missed this for the same reason largely, but sort of recall thinking about some in an rrsp when ogi was preaching it sub-3.00, and never bought, duh ... its chart does not look to me entirely un-auspicious at this point ... ? ... not compelling either, hmmm ... sort of watching, along with kam.v [more so], which i think ogi also likes atc.v - above the 1.90s i only had a few left, forgotten about in a tfsa, offed them sub-4.00 i think, because there was a gap below, lol ... can't even look at the thing now, for the shame ... but, i picked the interim bottom well, added quite a few just before it broke 1.40, so what the hell, it was a gainer usa.v - sold lots .54-.56, chart had just gotten too steep ... got part back already, avg .45 ... traded this one lots, smallish as a hold but i tend to have orders in on both sides, to make extra tickets for the active trader status, been real good to us in two rrsp accts ... so that was close to a top, three cents off amz.v - yeah no, somebody or somebodies want Amazon, you can tell eh, that's not distribution for the most part ... small elements of it, you could say that's what i did, gave up a small fraction, likely others doing the same, lock in a few gains just in case ... but that combination of quality of project, tight share structure, and overall situation does not appear very often ... since aru.v actually, comparisons are right-on imho ... political issues at forty bucks says ICD, well i say bring em on, and not a penny lower, lol